Re: Huddersfield : Fri Aug 19, 2022 12:43 pm  

Don’t understand why a supporter of another club should be concerned with the Giants crowd size? The Giants are in the playoffs on the back of their on field success. It makes no difference to any other club, as long as they can operate on the income they receive from the TV deal plus any other income they can generate.

Re: Huddersfield : Fri Aug 19, 2022 2:14 pm  

Beverley red wrote:

Don’t understand why a supporter of another club should be concerned with the Giants crowd size? The Giants are in the playoffs on the back of their on field success. It makes no difference to any other club, as long as they can operate on the income they receive from the TV deal plus any other income they can generate.

he doesn't care, he will be whacking off to the number of bites he has received as that is his only purpose on these boards

Re: Huddersfield : Fri Aug 19, 2022 5:11 pm  

Beverley red wrote:

Don’t understand why a supporter of another club should be concerned with the Giants crowd size? The Giants are in the playoffs on the back of their on field success. It makes no difference to any other club, as long as they can operate on the income they receive from the TV deal plus any other income they can generate.

Because it’s not a good look for a game that wants to take itself seriously

Re: Huddersfield : Fri Aug 19, 2022 8:09 pm  

TheWarringtonWolve69 wrote:

Because it’s not a good look for a game that wants to take itself seriously

It matters not if it’s only one man & his dog watching, our game is only viable as long as SKY are prepared to put up the money. We had a a well supported game when our teams were full of part time players playing a game that was a lot more exciting than the present offering. Going full time has done nothing for our sport. What has put the skids under our game is the progress in Australia who don’t have to compete with the overwhelming media dominance of football & who have no interest of anything other than the NRL.

Re: Huddersfield : Fri Aug 19, 2022 9:34 pm  

Hangerman2 wrote:

I grew up in the Fartown area of Huddersfield

This blokes as rough as arses

Re: Huddersfield : Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:41 am  

Fax would get 2 or 3 times that many in superleague but we aren’t one of woke rfl favourites!

Re: Huddersfield : Sat Aug 20, 2022 9:16 am  

Hangerman2 wrote:

he doesn't care, he will be whacking off to the number of bites he has received as that is his only sad purpose in life

Edited for accuracy.

Re: Huddersfield : Sat Aug 20, 2022 1:22 pm  

TheWarringtonWolve69 wrote:

Because it’s not a good look for a game that wants to take itself seriously

Who do you think brought in IMG?
……… careful now whilst you think it through……..

Re: Huddersfield : Sat Aug 20, 2022 11:38 pm  

Beverley red wrote:

It matters not if it’s only one man & his dog watching, our game is only viable as long as SKY are prepared to put up the money. We had a a well supported game when our teams were full of part time players playing a game that was a lot more exciting than the present offering. Going full time has done nothing for our sport. What has put the skids under our game is the progress in Australia who don’t have to compete with the overwhelming media dominance of football & who have no interest of anything other than the NRL.

Which sky aren’t. That’s the point. They want out

Re: Huddersfield : Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:34 am  

TheWarringtonWolve69 wrote:

Which sky aren’t. That’s the point. They want out

channel 4 are doing a better job anyway. and will bring the game back to a wider audience if they market it better in a regular slot.
What is not good for the sport is hordes of supporters fighting amongst themselves, bricking coaches, or those saints fans letting off flares or chucking stuff at players on the pitch eh wolfie.......
you can have a go at the numbers at huddersfield but one thing you cant do is have a go at the behaviour of our fans. wakey and salford have fewer fans than huddersfield and still cant behave so you cant argue its because there are fewer.