Re: Derek Exotic find a loophole : Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:45 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

I think you're forgetting Wigans "breaching the spirit of the cap" way back in 2006, or are all the worlds woes Saints fault these days? Will we find out Liz Truss is McManus long lost cousin?

The reality is clubs will play on the edge of the rules that they think they can get away with. However the operational rules don't leave a whole load of wiggle room;
The "loophole" as it was announced focuses on the 21 man squad, but ignores the club register. I believe the club need to submit their SL register by the 1-December, at which point the RFL will, presumably, reject the 8th submitted non-fed registration.

Meow..

Re: Derek Exotic find a loophole : Sat Oct 29, 2022 12:37 pm  

It kind of feels like Derek is trying to do what Wigan used to do in the early days of the salary cap and quota. I.e just refuse to comply with the regulations, stating that he has contracts in place with the players. The longer this goes on the higher the chance is of the powers that be just finding the difficult questions so awkward that they end up allowing Leigh to keep them all. Maybe this will be how the promoted clubs are given a chance, they become exempt from the quota regulations for existing contracts.

Re: Derek Exotic find a loophole : Sun Oct 30, 2022 8:44 pm  

Saddened/bellend Where's Steph Curry?

Re: Derek Exotic find a loophole : Sun Oct 30, 2022 9:49 pm  

Bartholemew Smythe wrote:

Saddened/bellend Where's Steph Curry?

Why not look beyond your obsession with trolling for once? Your owner HAS stated this is how he's planning on dealing with having two too many quota players in the squad for next season. Why can't you just give your opinion on that?

Re: Derek Exotic find a loophole : Mon Oct 31, 2022 12:30 am  

He's more like Den Perry from Phoenix nights, than Joe Exotic

Re: Derek Exotic find a loophole : Tue Nov 01, 2022 12:55 am  

Saddened! wrote:

Why not look beyond your obsession with trolling for once? Your owner HAS stated this is how he's planning on dealing with having two too many quota players in the squad for next season. Why can't you just give your opinion on that?

One

Re: Derek Exotic find a loophole : Tue Nov 01, 2022 10:07 am  

Budgiezilla wrote:

One

Has it been confirmed that Lam is off now? I hadn't seen that.

[Mild Rover]

Re: Derek Exotic find a loophole : Tue Nov 01, 2022 10:00 pm  

CM Punk wrote:

Didn't Hull KR try something with de-registering overseas players a few years back?

It was more complicated back then because overseas quota and non-fed trained co-existed.

When we signed Willie Mason we needed to get somebody off quota. Mason was entitled to a Tongan passport but couldn’t get it because Tonga was having a massive constitutional crisis and the government wasn’t functioning. Ben Galea had also tried to get a Maltese passport but couldn’t for some reason - maybe one generation too far removed or something like that. We’d made a big song and dance about signing Mason and were desperate to get him over, so asked for a dispensation (he was, after all, entitled to that Tongan passport). That was a ‘no’ and instead of going with that simple solution, we were allowed to temporarily de-register Michael Dobson when he got injured - there was normally and maybe still is a rule against ‘carouselling’ overseas players to avoid the limit on their numbers. The hope being that Mason’s Tongan passport would come through while Dobson recuperated, which proved moot because Mason sodded off to French RU very briefly and then back to Aus.

Interestingly (to me), the rule against carouselling applied specifically to overseas players. Suggesting that fed-trained players could be de- and re-registered at any time. For a long time I assumed that the wealthy SL clubs were likely using that as a within the rules if not the spirit cap-dodging tactic, but I could never confirm it.

Re: Derek Exotic find a loophole : Tue Nov 01, 2022 10:53 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Has it been confirmed that Lam is off now? I hadn't seen that.

Most certainly one.