Re: Matt king : Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:59 pm  

getdownmonkeyman wrote: Wigan withdrew according to this: http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php? ... 4#12603654 So it can't be both, can it. Yes it does MO did not want to pay more than 250k. Wire did

getdownmonkeyman wrote: Wigan withdrew according to this: http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php? ... 4#12603654 So it can't be both, can it. Yes it does MO did not want to pay more than 250k. Wire did

Re: Matt king : Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:27 pm  

tank123 wrote:

Yes it does MO did not want to pay more than 250k.

Wire did

If Wigan retracted their offer, how can we outbid them?

Are you king piemon?

: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:09 pm  

king piemon wrote:

They have been class for you this year not saying they have not but king

Carmont is better

sorry not looked any further on this topic, that just made me laugh.

Re: Matt king : Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:35 pm  

cadoo wrote:

we should be 1st or 2nd but fans have come to the realization that the game is not how it was 10/15 years ago when we won every trophy in rugby league at free will.

There was nothing free about it. Thats why you sold your ground becuase of the massive debts you had and are now tennets in a ground which doesn't want you. You bought your success and sold your souls.

You continue with the arrogrance that you are above the rules and that RL would be nothing without you. In truth RL doesn't need wigan as much as wigan needs RL.

: Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:44 am  

getdownmonkeyman wrote: Prove he does. http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/ru ... -19433590/ That has it listed at £1.3m. Probably the same as Barrett

getdownmonkeyman wrote: Prove he does. http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/ru ... -19433590/ That has it listed at £1.3m. Probably the same as Barrett

: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:46 am  

Nobody consistently picked for the Aus national team is anything less than an excellent player. The difference between the Kings and Carmonts of this world is that the latter are solid and reliable, where the former are solid and reliable AND capable of those bits of magic that provide the 5% difference that separates the best players from the normal players. That 5% is what it takes to be successful.

Nobody, outside the Warrington club top management, knows how much King is earning. One thing is for sure, the Wire, unlike certain pie-eating clubs, does not break the salary cap and the devil take the hindmost.

: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:31 am  

Broxy Music wrote:

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/2007/07/10/warrington-wolves-swoop-for-matt-king-100252-19433590/

That has it listed at £1.3m.

Probably the same as Barrett

Irrefutable evidence. If they reported the World is flat, would you believe that too?

Re: Matt king : Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:24 am  

king piemon wrote: Is it me or is he a waste of money? He's done nothing this season and is injured most of the time I think he's on a holiday First post on this thread king piemon wrote: He can play Centre aswell would be an awesome buy if we could get him imo

king piemon wrote: Is it me or is he a waste of money? He's done nothing this season and is injured most of the time I think he's on a holiday First post on this thread king piemon wrote: He can play Centre aswell would be an awesome buy if we could get him imo

Re: Matt king : Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:28 am  

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

Cruncher wrote:

Why, do you think it's possible he's on less than Carmont?

Put it this way, even Mr. Overspend himself, Maurice Lindsay, pulled back from the deal King wanted.

getdownmonkeyman wrote:

Do you know the reason why? I do.

He inadvertently answered you in another post.

Cruncher wrote:

When struggling, make something up.

Re: Matt king : Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:57 pm  

McClennan wrote: First post on this thread I did put that he was good in oz but he's done nothing over here has he?

McClennan wrote: First post on this thread I did put that he was good in oz but he's done nothing over here has he?