: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:20 am  

Eccleshill Rhino wrote:

Because their genetic make up is different - do Darren Lockyear and Israel Folau look like they have the same genetic roots? They were probably both born in Australia - but that is the only thing they have in common. Either explain why you think they are the same or accept you are wrong and move on

thanks for explaining it.


yep thats a racist comment.

there is no gene type to be a nationality.

once you are a citizen you are all the same

its good to see you look at someone like darren locker and think "pure australian" and israel folau and dont.

thats exactly the way a racist would differentiate people.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:27 am  

ha ha ha you knob...

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:31 am  

roughyedspud wrote:

ha ha ha you knob...

thats a pure english comment.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:32 am  

dally messenger wrote:

thanks for explaining it.


yep thats a racist comment.

there is no gene type to be a nationality.

once you are a citizen you are all the same

its good to see you look at someone like darren locker and think "pure australian" and israel folau and dont.

thats exactly the way a racist would differentiate people.

1) Attack The Poster: Instead of addressing the argument that has been made, people using this method attack the person making it instead. This is particularly easy for many delusional people such as Dally. The charge made doesn't even have to be accurate, in fact it's better in some ways if it's off target. That's because the more whacked out the charge is, the more compelled your opponent will feel to spend his time defending himself while you continue to make your points.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:32 am  

differentiating people on the colour of their skin is the definition of racism

to me skin colour doesnt matter, if they are born here they are all the same.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:36 am  

see how you've flipped it round....as usual

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:39 am  

roughyedspud wrote:

see how you've flipped it round....as usual

google what the term "pure" means.

saying someone is a pure australian if they look like darren lockyer is a racist statement.

clearly if you dont come from that background then you cant be as "pure" as that.

the problem is the word pure you nitwit.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:41 am  

roughyedspud wrote:

a 'pure australian' i guess would be an aboriginal chap...though i'm guessing he did'nt mean to use the term 'pure australian' in the racist manner you are trying to make out...


he,as it's already been pointed out,was trying to highlight the difference in the genetic make up between australians of european extraction & australians of pacific island extraction

just in case you blanked it out the first time

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:42 am  

roughyedspud wrote:

just in case you blanked it out the first time

dont use the term pure australian.

i dont need to keep repeating myself here.

im more than happy ive made my point well enough and that ER has been shown up for what he is.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:45 am  

dally messenger wrote:

differentiating people on the colour of their skin is the definition of racism

to me skin colour doesnt matter, if they are born here they are all the same.

no it isnt you might want to look up the definition of the term racism if you think knowing the difference between black and white is racism

and nobody mentioned skin colour,

Sonny Bill Williams is a white man of tongan descent,

you brought skin colour into it, he simply said those of polynesian extraction arent genetically pure australian, which is a self fulfilling sentence

unless of course you thought all peoples of polynesion descent are black and that if you arent black you cant be of polynesian descent

you racist bigot

see we can all do it, its not that hard or impressive dally