Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:51 pm  

garyhulsefan wrote:

I thought Cas had sold Wheldon Road for £7bn?

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:12 pm  

It appears that not for the first time, Wakefield fans have massively overstated what someone has said and made a mountain out of a mole hill:

RW has not objected, he has simply answered a query. He confirmed that the Tigers were happy to take part in the council funded feasibility study and that Wakey weren't. He added that Wakey could use GH as tenants.

So what's wrong with that? He was asked these questions and he answered them.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:24 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

It appears that not for the first time, Wakefield fans have massively overstated what someone has said and made a mountain out of a mole hill:

So what's wrong with that? He was asked these questions and he answered them.

Give over and grow up. It was a request from a local residents group, not the Planning Inspector. Any one with a brain not wishing to damage a fellow club would simply not have replied. It's called professional courtesy, I know it's a facebook Jerry Springer world but not every question has to be answered. The only reason he has answered was to cause mischief END OF.

If I was giving away beauty treatments and I wrote you a letter and asked you if your wife was fit or a munter - would you reply if she were the latter? It's a question after all.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:31 pm  

vastman wrote:

he has answered was to cause mischief END OF.

In your mind yes.

Stop trying to make a mountain over a mole hill, or do you really have that much of a chip on your shoulder you have to use a non-story to rally the troops?

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:36 pm  

A sad and desperate act from a man who knows Cas have no chance of ever getting Glasshoughton built and that his time is up. A pathetic attempt to derail another clubs progress because he is incapable of doing his job correctly at his own club.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:37 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

In your mind yes.

Stop trying to make a mountain over a mole hill, or do you really have that much of a chip on your shoulder you have to use a non-story to rally the troops?

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:38 pm  

Theboyem wrote:

A sad and desperate act from a man who knows Cas have no chance of ever getting Glasshoughton built and that his time is up. A pathetic attempt to derail another clubs progress because he is incapable of doing his job correctly at his own club.

Want to keep posting false information?

This is yet another sad and desperate attempt by Wakefield fans to try and pass off the failings of everything connected with Wakefield onto Castleford.

The fact of the matter is, what RW's letter included just confirmed facts that had been in the public domain for over a year.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:43 pm  

If there is no developments on these grounds in 2012 the only thing i can see is you either upgrade where you are or agree to share a purpose built ground and keep your own identities

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:47 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

:lol:

Want to keep posting false information?

This is yet another sad and desperate attempt by Wakefield fans to try and pass off the failings of everything connected with Wakefield onto Castleford.

The fact of the matter is, what RW's letter included just confirmed facts that had been in the public domain for over a year.

He had no need to get involved at this stage. A pathetic act by a pathetic man supported blindly by poor souls like yourselves. Good luck with GH, you're going to need it.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:51 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

The fact of the matter is, what RW's letter included just confirmed facts that had been in the public domain for over a year.

Why on Earth, in his capacity as CEO of Cas Tigers, would he feel the need to write a letter stating things that are in the public domain??

He should have kept out.