Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:56 pm  

dboy wrote:

Why on Earth, in his capacity as CEO of Cas Tigers, would he feel the need to write a letter stating things that are in the public domain??

He should have kept out.

Gronk is taking the Ostrich approach, only i think he's buried his head elsewhere if he thinks RW is anything but a spanner in the works of NM.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:02 pm  

Theboyem wrote:

He had no need to get involved at this stage. A pathetic act by a pathetic man supported blindly by poor souls like yourselves. Good luck with GH, you're going to need it.

Why does he need luck? Last time I read it was Wakefield and newmarket at public enquiry!....what makes u think it will be plain sailing?

Wind your neck back in!!!! Ranting and Raving u look like teenage fools....

The guy was asked questions and he answered them

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:10 pm  

fozz28 wrote:

Why does he need luck? Last time I read it was Wakefield and newmarket at public enquiry!....what makes u think it will be plain sailing?

Wind your neck back in!!!! Ranting and Raving u look like teenage fools....

The guy was asked questions and he answered them

Who asked you?

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:15 pm  

Theboyem wrote:

Who asked you?

Is this not a forum

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:44 pm  

fozz28 wrote:

Is this not a forum

No, it's an elephant.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:51 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

No, it's an elephant.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:56 pm  

fozz28 wrote:

Is this not a forum

Your reply made no sense. Who is saying it that the PI is going to be plain sailing? It certainly isn't. What doesn't make it any easier is the CEO of another club making it more difficult by reportedly making claims of being able to share at a stadium that doesn't exist and going by his own clubs press release isn't going to in the neat future either. Richard Wright should have politely declined to comment on the situation, end of.

If Newmarket gets passed and at some point in future there is a planning application go in for Wheldon Road, would RW apprieciate a letter from Wakefields CEO saying that the petition they have saying a supermarket should be built there so Glasshoughton can be built, it isn't needed as they can share Newmarket with Wakefield? No? Thought not.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:59 pm  

Theboyem wrote:

If Newmarket gets passed and at some point in future there is a planning application go in for Wheldon Road, would RW apprieciate a letter from Wakefields CEO saying that the petition they have saying a supermarket should be built there so Glasshoughton can be built, it isn't needed as they can share Newmarket with Wakefield? No? Thought not.

Once again, you're posting falsities to suit your own agenda, here is what RW wrote:

"I have been asked to comment on the position of Castleford tigers with regard to the possibility of another club playing at our new stadium at Glasshoughton.

In the first instance I can confirm that we are looking for new organisations to use our new facilities in a number of ways and we would be happy for this to be in the form of another sports club using the stadium subject to a suitable agreement being put in place. It is a community stadium and it is our objective that it is used regularly by the community.

More specifically we did agree to participate in a Wakefield Council funded feasibility study in July 2010 to determine the best location for a new community stadium in the Wakefield district; this would accommodate a ground share between ourselves and Wakefield wildcats. The Council, to our disappointment, were forced to abandon this study when Wakefield wildcats refused to participate.

However, whist we have made significant progress with our site at junction32, including a detailed planning consent in April 2011, our position with regard to sharing our new facility at Junction 32 with another club has not changed. We plan to increase revenues into the stadium from a number of sources and provide significant benefits to the community.

If you need any further information do not hesitate to contact me"

As you can see, all he is doing is confirming what has been said in the past - he isn't going out of his way to say no there should not be a stadium at Newmarket.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:06 pm  

And remember that RW has actually being ASKED for his comments, not simply offered them.
And I have to say, I'm not sure what it is that isn't true?

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:09 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

Once again, you're posting falsities to suit your own agenda, here is what RW wrote:

As you can see, all he is doing is confirming what has been said in the past - he isn't going out of his way to say no there should not be a stadium at Newmarket.

Whats the 'falsities' there?

In effect he is saying theres no need to build a stadium there, they can play at ours. Not helpful, not necessary and not likely to be happening anytime soon. I'll say it again, he wasn't obliged to say anything but he couldn't help himself. He should have declined to comment.