: Sat Dec 06, 2008 3:12 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=386124

SO basically, the rugby world cup final attracted more viewers alone, that the entire rugby league world cup?

: Sat Dec 06, 2008 3:35 pm  

see why he gets a 1/2 for intelligence

: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:12 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

see why he gets a 1/2 for intelligence

According to your stats.

9m in Aus
2 m in the UK

Are you telling me that a further 25m tuned in worldwide, in rugby league hotspots like Norway, Germany, Holland, the west indies etc?

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:43 am  

Eurob0y wrote: According to your stats. 9m in Aus 2 m in the UK Are you telling me that a further 25m tuned in worldwide, in rugby league hotspots like Norway, Germany, Holland, the west indies etc? no mate im saying you are thick as s**t trying to argue that. heres another example of some stupid comments youve made : http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=387294 benji marshall not injury prone. try watching some RL some times instead of that other s**t. it will help when you comment on RL

Eurob0y wrote: According to your stats. 9m in Aus 2 m in the UK Are you telling me that a further 25m tuned in worldwide, in rugby league hotspots like Norway, Germany, Holland, the west indies etc? no mate im saying you are thick as s**t trying to argue that. heres another example of some stupid comments youve made : http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=387294 benji marshall not injury prone. try watching some RL some times instead of that other s**t. it will help when you comment on RL

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:24 am  

Eurob0y wrote:

According to your stats.

9m in Aus
2 m in the UK

Are you telling me that a further 25m tuned in worldwide, in rugby league hotspots like Norway, Germany, Holland, the west indies etc?

well according to your stats, 4 billion people tuned into the rugby union world cup, when only 33 million watced the final.

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:20 am  

hutch wrote:

well according to your stats, 4 billion people tuned into the rugby union world cup, when only 33 million watced the final.

Actually it was 4.3b.

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:24 am  

dally messenger wrote: no mate im saying you are thick as s**t trying to argue that. heres another example of some stupid comments youve made : http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=387294 benji marshall not injury prone. try watching some RL some times instead of that other s**t. it will help when you comment on RL Im thick as s*** for giving you facts as to why the proper rugby world cup final had more viewers than the entire rugby lite world cup? You are a very poor troll.

dally messenger wrote: no mate im saying you are thick as s**t trying to argue that. heres another example of some stupid comments youve made : http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=387294 benji marshall not injury prone. try watching some RL some times instead of that other s**t. it will help when you comment on RL Im thick as s*** for giving you facts as to why the proper rugby world cup final had more viewers than the entire rugby lite world cup? You are a very poor troll.

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 1:56 pm  

Eurob0y wrote:

Im thick as s***

good to see you agree.

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 1:56 pm  

Eurob0y wrote:

Actually it was 4.3b.

yeah they forgot to include mexico.

: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:22 pm  

Eurob0y wrote:

Actually it was 4.3b.

made up figures, cause 3/4 of the worlds population dont have a tv......Its the same with the footy figures..just a load of crap...