Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 2:40 pm  

http://www.rugby-league.com/article/380 ... rs-charged Charnley charged Grade C. Tautai Grade B.

http://www.rugby-league.com/article/380 ... rs-charged Charnley charged Grade C. Tautai Grade B.

Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 3:34 pm  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

http://www.rugby-league.com/article/38009/four-super-league-players-charged

Charnley charged Grade C. Tautai Grade B.

you missed 2:

Ben Crooks (Castleford) - Grade A Dangerous Contact (EGP available)
Scott Moore (Wakefield) - Grade A High Tackle (EGP not available)

Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 3:44 pm  

[Gareth] wrote:

you missed 2:

I didn't miss anything.

I posted the charges pertinent to this thread.

Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:50 pm  

These threads are hillarious. In Kevin Keegan style I'd love it if we win something this year simply because of the amount of people who'd be sat crying in to their bitter.

Both will probably be banned for at least this week and possibly the semi final. If they are we'll just crack on as we have all year.

Enjoy the thrill if it comes off chaps.

Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:54 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

These threads are hillarious. In Kevin Keegan style I'd love it if we win something this year simply because of the amount of people who'd be sat crying in to their bitter.

Both will probably be banned for at least this week and possibly the semi final. If they are we'll just crack on as we have all year.

Enjoy the thrill if it comes off chaps.

I hope they both get banned but it's nothing to do with me being bitter mate.

They both deserve a ban and it would be an extraordinary display of weakness if the RFL don't see this through.

They have a record of bottling it prior to big matches and it's always been something that frustrates me. Regardless of the team involved I really hope they don't back down this time.

Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:44 pm  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

They have a record of bottling it prior to big matches and it's always been something that frustrates me.

They do?

I assume you have evidence?

Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:55 pm  

Cronus wrote:

They do?

I assume you have evidence?

Yes they do. When I get a spare hour I'll compile a list of examples if you like.

Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:11 pm  

Ironic that they class contact with the ref as bad as an attack to the head. I would not be surprised if Charnley got the full three match ban, to show the laughing stock that is running our sport. RL will be looked at as an amateur sport as long as it's run by amateurs.

Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:32 pm  

It's daft that Charnley is on a lesser charge than Tautai.

Why the RFL are now ambivalent about the same type of tackles they were giving substantial bans out for early in the season is strange.

I'd also far rather have seen the referee take action on the pitch against both Tautai and Charnley.

Charnley could've been sin binned and that'd be an end to it.

Tautai could've been punished too. It was obviously an illegal tackle and it wasn't hidden. One of the 3 officials should've seen it.

Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Mon Jul 18, 2016 11:05 pm  

Him wrote:

It's daft that Charnley is on a lesser charge than Tautai.

Why the RFL are now ambivalent about the same type of tackles they were giving substantial bans out for early in the season is strange.

I'd also far rather have seen the referee take action on the pitch against both Tautai and Charnley.

Charnley could've been sin binned and that'd be an end to it.

Tautai could've been punished too. It was obviously an illegal tackle and it wasn't hidden. One of the 3 officials should've seen it.

Despite the few that defend it it's a farcical system.