Re: ELSTONE : Fri Jan 29, 2021 11:36 am  

Donnyman wrote:

Well thanks for the reply, I get the venture capital thing if these people are adept at putting £Millions into a straight forward business that provides goods or services and reaping £Millions more as a result when sales rise thanks to that money being "invested".

But I can't think for the life of me what Superleague could have done with a capital investment. Superleague isn't a real business.

Those who own the clubs chuck Millions away because they can and because it's fun, and often because it's a release from proper business??

Doesn't Mr. Moran sink £Millions into Wire because it's a great hobby and something to enjoy outside proper business??

Something for him to enjoy ? It is Warrington

Re: ELSTONE : Fri Jan 29, 2021 1:20 pm  

Steph Curry wrote:

He was. But when all the clubs at the bottom of the league voted against it, hardly his fault

I mean you're usually wrong on everything, but not by this much.
The clubs which voted against were led by Leeds and St Helens who have about as much interest in surrendering control of their future income streams for a paltry amount of money up front as they have in having a second, smaller, team from Wigan in the league .

Re: ELSTONE : Fri Jan 29, 2021 4:20 pm  

The Ghost of '99 wrote:

I mean you're usually wrong on everything, but not by this much.
The clubs which voted against were led by Leeds and St Helens who have about as much interest in surrendering control of their future income streams for a paltry amount of money up front as they have in having a second, smaller, team from Wigan in the league .

Is this you Stephanie in yet another of your pathetic guises.You`re a bit of a tool aren`t you.

Re: ELSTONE : Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:50 pm  

Bartholemew Smythe wrote:

Is this you Stephanie in yet another of your pathetic guises.You`re a bit of a tool aren`t you.

Sorry if facts hurt.
Leeds and Saints voted against Toronto being excluded and voted against the PI rubbish.
Leigh are tangential but it's pretty clear the two most successful clubs in the league weren't seeking for them to be included.

On topic, Hetherington and McManus have their sights set on Elstone next - he'd better start delivering or he might find himself in trouble.

Re: ELSTONE : Fri Jan 29, 2021 7:56 pm  

The Ghost of '99 wrote:

Sorry if facts hurt.
Leeds and Saints voted against Toronto being excluded and voted against the PI rubbish.
Leigh are tangential but it's pretty clear the two most successful clubs in the league weren't seeking for them to be included.

On topic, Hetherington and McManus have their sights set on Elstone next - he'd better start delivering or he might find himself in trouble.

I`ll stick to my original thought on you,not worthy of comment,now back under your bridge. I wonder what username you use on TRL?

Re: ELSTONE : Fri Jan 29, 2021 8:03 pm  

Bartholemew Smythe wrote:

I`ll stick to my original thought on you,not worthy of comment,now back under your bridge. I wonder what username you use on TRL?

Bart, he hates Leigh with a passion. IF, and i do say IF Leigh do well in SL, I will be on the warpath to all those who have got Leigh nailed on for relegation.

Re: ELSTONE : Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:12 pm  

Cokey wrote:

Bart, he hates Leigh with a passion. IF, and i do say IF Leigh do well in SL, I will be on the warpath to all those who have got Leigh nailed on for relegation.

What is it Leeds fans or their hidden personna`s,can you not get over 1971.

Re: ELSTONE : Fri Jan 29, 2021 10:54 pm  

ploinerrhino wrote:

voted against what ?

The private equity investment. All the chairmen at the botttom of the league that have no money voted against it whilst The ones who do like McManus, Moran and Hetherington voted for it

Another reason why the skid rows of SL have too much sway and why our game is an embarrassment

Re: ELSTONE : Fri Jan 29, 2021 11:42 pm  

Steph Curry wrote:

The private equity investment. All the chairmen at the botttom of the league that have no money voted against it whilst The ones who do like McManus, Moran and Hetherington voted for it

Another reason why the skid rows of SL have too much sway and why our game is an embarrassment

So you're saying the ones with no money voted against a cash injection.
And the ones with loads of money voted for it despite its very aggressive terms and conditions?

Re: ELSTONE : Sat Jan 30, 2021 9:31 am  

The Ghost of '99 wrote:

So you're saying the ones with no money voted against a cash injection.
And the ones with loads of money voted for it despite its very aggressive terms and conditions?

It's just whoever it is goading as usual, dunno why you feed it?

The issue was that several SL clubs were heading for or maybe were or still are near collapse financially.

The money would have been for survival in the short term, venture capital isn't for that, it's for restructures that attract more money thus justifying the high fee charged to look into the possibilities.

Mr. Sadler spotted that one easily enough and suggested clubs continued to rattle the begging bowl at the Government....