Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:12 pm  

Theboyem wrote:

Whats the 'falsities' there?

In effect he is saying theres no need to build a stadium there, they can play at ours. Not helpful, not necessary and not likely to be happening anytime soon. I'll say it again, he wasn't obliged to say anything but he couldn't help himself. He should have declined to comment.

Why should he decline to comment? Truth too damaging?

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:17 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

Why should he decline to comment? Truth too damaging?

Probably not, as I believe we can counter it by proving playing at GH isn't vialble for WT. But if he gets off on trying to damage other clubs progress rather concentrating on his own club then he's a sad individual.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:23 pm  

Theboyem wrote:

Probably not, as I believe we can counter it by proving playing at GH isn't vialble for WT. But if he gets off on trying to damage other clubs progress rather concentrating on his own club then he's a sad individual.

Look, it's a business.
We've seen it recently with regard to the supermarket application on WR. One company will object to another doing something if this threatens their long term future.
And the if I were you I wouldn't worry about RW's letter - there are MUCH bigger obstacles to NM than this.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:26 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

Look, it's a business.
We've seen it recently with regard to the supermarket application on WR. One company will object to another doing something if this threatens their long term future.
And the if I were you I wouldn't worry about RW's letter - there are MUCH bigger obstacles to NM than this.

So you agree then RW and Cas are trying to assist the objectors and de-rail NM.

Nice one.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:29 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

So you agree then RW and Cas are trying to assist the objectors and de-rail NM.

Nice one.

Yes, I agree that this is the intention.
At first I thought RW was responding to a request from the decision-making body, but it seems he (and by default Cas) are actually providing information to support those objecting to Newmarket.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:32 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

Look, it's a business.
We've seen it recently with regard to the supermarket application on WR. One company will object to another doing something if this threatens their long term future.
And the if I were you I wouldn't worry about RW's letter - there are MUCH bigger obstacles to NM than this.

Not that I'm adding my opinion to the "is he/isn't he trying to derail Newmarket" b*tchfest, but this isn't just "business" if he is. The idea that he can derail another club in an attempt to benefit his license bid is daft. The RFL pick who goes in the league remember. I'm pretty sure they won't be too keen to pick clubs that sabotage others.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:32 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

Yes, I agree that this is the intention.
At first I thought RW was responding to a request from the decision-making body, but it seems he (and by default Cas) are actually providing information to support those objecting to Newmarket.

And do you agree with their decision to do this?

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:36 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

I'm pretty sure they won't be too keen to pick clubs that sabotage others.

And nobody is doing that, Wright was asked if Wakefield refused to take part in a feasibility study, which they did and was also asked if they would be able to play at Glasshoughton, which he also confirmed.

He did nothing wrong, and it will in no way have any effect on the outcome, there are much bigger issues with the whole development than the fact Glasshoughton is an option for Wakefield.

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:37 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

Look, it's a business.
We've seen it recently with regard to the supermarket application on WR. One company will object to another doing something if this threatens their long term future.
And the if I were you I wouldn't worry about RW's letter - there are MUCH bigger obstacles to NM than this.

But if RW is so confident about GH why the need to interfere, it wouldn't have any effect on Cas?

Re: Stadium Developments : Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:41 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

And nobody is doing that, Wright was asked if Wakefield refused to take part in a feasibility study, which they did and was also asked if they would be able to play at Glasshoughton, which he also confirmed.

He did nothing wrong, and it will in no way have any effect on the outcome, there are much bigger issues with the whole development than the fact Glasshoughton is an option for Wakefield.

Why did they ask ,and why did he answer