Re: Any chance for the disciplinary panel to redeem themsel : Wed Jul 27, 2016 6:54 am
Judder Man wrote:
Wigan's Embarrassing Viewpoint Quote to the Disciplinary.
Player accompanied by Assistant Coach John Winder. Pleads not guilty to punching with a clenched fist. Concedes there was striking with an open hand to opponents face as a result of provocation. There had been other incidents in the same game between both players that had been dealt with. Matters appeared to have calmed down to some form of normality. The opponent then in an aggressive manner approaches the player and touches his face in a provocative manner. The player reacts by pushing his open hand towards the opponent and there is minimal contact with the opponents face. This is not a violent strike and the effect is not substantial.
We know it was a soft punch, but claiming an open hand push..........is taking the mick.
Player accompanied by Assistant Coach John Winder. Pleads not guilty to punching with a clenched fist. Concedes there was striking with an open hand to opponents face as a result of provocation. There had been other incidents in the same game between both players that had been dealt with. Matters appeared to have calmed down to some form of normality. The opponent then in an aggressive manner approaches the player and touches his face in a provocative manner. The player reacts by pushing his open hand towards the opponent and there is minimal contact with the opponents face. This is not a violent strike and the effect is not substantial.
We know it was a soft punch, but claiming an open hand push..........is taking the mick.
But the opponent was aggressive and provocative. They really are ridiculous. On the Tautai one the other week they in defence claim it was "almost a perfect tackle"