headhunter wrote:
No, it wasn't an issue. If you penalize then you would be giving 5-6 penalties for similar incidents every game, especially in derby matches or the Grand Final FFS where everyone is fired up. There was absolutely nothing in the initial challenge. What this comes down to is that you're trying to create an issue that paints Flower as the bad guy because he later punched someone on the ground, and justifies Hohaia attacking an unsuspecting player in the head because he's a smaller man and was subsequently knocked out. If the roles had been reversed and it had been the much larger Flower deliberately running and leaping at Hohaia with an elbow then it would've likely caused a broken jaw and arguably be viewed as as bad an incident as what actually happened. Hohaia isn't blameless just because he wasn't physically capable of injuring Flower.
I have no reason to paint anyone as a bad guy. I don't support Saints, I don't support Wigan. I want to see a fair and legal game. I'd call it the same irrespective of the team.
Similar incidents? I see late challenges punished all the time, I see obstructions penalised and I see striking punished too. It was striking with the forearm by Flower to the back of the head of Hohaia.
If it was a collision, I'd say it was a collision. But it clearly isn't. Where did I say Hohaia shouldn't be punished? I didn't, I said I can see why he retaliated and that it was handbags and may have got a yellow.
But you didn't answer my question: are you a Wigan fan? If so, it would go a long way for you trying to justify why you're painting Hohaia as "the bad guy".