Re: The mad doctor : Fri Mar 14, 2014 1:44 pm
bewareshadows wrote:
Ok I'll chuck my 2p worth in.
To me it looks like there can be a danger of colussion (spelling).
However, this is the case and always has been the case in any family run business. The law can cover most aspects of life, but if I wish to buy something off ebay and I don't have the cash to win, who is to know if my wife gives me an interest free loan or gift.
I get why it makes people uncomfortable. But there is little the law can do regarding this. If Mr Koukash turns up at Bradford and starts telling them to drop certain games then fine someone can tape it. But within the confines of his own home he can do as he wishes.
I doubt Mrs Koukash is her own man so to speak, but really it's bleating about a situation no one can do much about.
All relationships are different some couples split everything, some keep finances separate and all the combinations inbetween. But this is something done verbally and internally within a relationship, very few couple actaully have documents to describe there financial goings on. (until divorce when the courts have to decided who owns what)
You can think it's great you can think she's a proxy owner. But there is little anyone can do to prove or legislate for it.
To me it looks like there can be a danger of colussion (spelling).
However, this is the case and always has been the case in any family run business. The law can cover most aspects of life, but if I wish to buy something off ebay and I don't have the cash to win, who is to know if my wife gives me an interest free loan or gift.
I get why it makes people uncomfortable. But there is little the law can do regarding this. If Mr Koukash turns up at Bradford and starts telling them to drop certain games then fine someone can tape it. But within the confines of his own home he can do as he wishes.
I doubt Mrs Koukash is her own man so to speak, but really it's bleating about a situation no one can do much about.
All relationships are different some couples split everything, some keep finances separate and all the combinations inbetween. But this is something done verbally and internally within a relationship, very few couple actaully have documents to describe there financial goings on. (until divorce when the courts have to decided who owns what)
You can think it's great you can think she's a proxy owner. But there is little anyone can do to prove or legislate for it.
Agreed. And I apologise for the other Bulls poster. Hit headed indeed.
Regarding her showing her own income Streams, is this really the case? Think it's been mentioned before, but if I won the euro millions, I wouldn't have any income stream. I don't know the rules inside out but all I have seen in the press is there are no rules that say this can't happen.
The fantasy idea that Bradford or Salford could throw a game is laughable. It just will not happen. It's not a computer game where you can just set one team to lose. Koukash would have to ask the coach/players to do this. Again it won't happen. Players and coaches do not throw games. The fans wouldn't put up with it ad wouldn't it be illegal anyway.
I am the hash browns of rlfans 
