Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:12 pm  

Khlav Kalash wrote:

That would be ok but they just couldn't resist that silly baseball style pin-stripe pattern which cheapens it immediately.

Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:25 pm  

Don't see why people have an issue with the Wigan kit.

Simple design, colours work together, not overloaded with sponsors. I like it quite a lot really, much more than the home kit.

Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:26 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

That would be ok but they just couldn't resist that silly baseball style pin-stripe pattern which cheapens it immediately.

I agree so your attempt at a dig at me is an epic fail old boy

Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:27 pm  

Not a dig Vasty hence the . Lighten up old boy.

Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:29 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

Not a dig Vasty hence the . Lighten up old boy.

Yes it was - I'd have thought the emoticon suggested I was lightened, you do know how they work don't you?

Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:35 pm  

vastman wrote:

you do know how they work don't you?

No - I haven't got a clue how they work. I am from the uneducated populace of Castleford after all.

Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:48 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

No - I haven't got a clue how they work. I am from the uneducated populace of Castleford after all.

Correct

Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:49 pm  

Wigans is not bad for an away kit.

Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:50 pm  

CM Punk wrote:

Don't see why people have an issue with the Wigan kit.

Simple design, colours work together, not overloaded with sponsors. I like it quite a lot really, much more than the home kit.

Are you blind, it has to be a Micky take - and no the colours don't work together unless you're a pimp from Harlem in the 1970s

Re: 2017 Kits* : Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:52 pm  

Willzay wrote:

Wigans is not bad for an away kit.

I thought you'd got better with your posts recently, don't let me down