: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:41 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

nothing......HTH
What a lot of people do not appreciate is the size of London compared to your provincial little outposts. We also have teams that play football in something called "the premiership" as well as other leagues beneath that. Then again, we have some other guys who kick a ball shaped like a rugby league ball and they are quite popular too, having actually won something at an international level recently. Then their is the rest of the stuff on offer....compared to say...CASTLEFORD
Google things to do in London on a saturday and you get 6,240,000 options...try CASTLEFORD
Still it's nice to know that franchise points for attendance = 1
HTH

But most of them involve contact with cockneys and so arent very inviting

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:25 pm  

pyeman wrote:

But most of them involve contact with cockneys and so arent very inviting

or involve going further south than chesterfield where the people start getting stranger after there !

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:28 pm  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

or involve going further south than chesterfield where the people start getting stranger after there !

Dont forget that the beer is p*ss weak as well!

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:31 pm  

pyeman wrote:

Dont forget that the beer is p*ss weak as well!

sshhh they'll be calling us flatcappers soon !!

Re: SL crowds in 2000 vs SL crowds in 2008 : Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:03 pm  

rover49 wrote:

I know of many who never set foot in Boulevard and jumped on the shiny new stadium bandwagon, not a criticism, we all have them. It was the inference that the attendances were built on gradually I was responding to.

I can't, for one second, believe anyone would start following a club just on the back of the stadium.