Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:07 am  

Did someone trying buying the LSV to give to Leigh, are they not selling period or asking too much?

Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:14 am  

Him wrote:

Yes they do.
Yes you do. The money has been lent to you and secured on the house. No one controls or owns that house other than you. The only way the lender could do anything whatsoever with that house is if you did keep up repayments.

Utter rubbish. As FeartheVee says, the buyer owns the house as the deeds to the house state. Not the lender. Otherwise someone better inform the Land Registry and the DVLA to change the name on who owns my house and car.

You appear very defensive for some reason. I suggest you stop with the bizarre paranoia that everyone is against Wakefield and just accept the fact that people are praising Saints for something.
Plus as mentioned by others, Saints own the stadium.

Just one small point with regards DVLA.
The logbook/V5 merely shows the registered keeper of the vehicle,the registered keeper may not necessarily be the person who has title to the vehicle.

As you were.

Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:28 am  

What a silly thread this has turned into , with lots of symantics and "Technically" I am sure you are all very knowledgable people but it doesnt matter how "technically" we owe money on the stadium or to who , the plain fact is that Saints decide how to use it , they take the gate reciepts , they earn from many revenue streams the stadium generates , SAINTS do , not the council, not any other entity , SAINTS!! so de facto we own the stadium

[Kosh]

Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 10:21 am  

knockersbumpMKII wrote:

Okay, just so you dont continue to make more errors in thinking.
To own something outright, or "free and clear," is to own it without any liens or other debts attached to it, like owning a car or a house for which the loan has been paid off - to have "clear title"

Have a think. Why is the act of taking your house away if you fail to keep up the repayments on your mortgage called repossession?

A house - or any other building - is legally owned by whoever has their name on the deeds and in the land registry. Simples.

Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:13 am  

Latest pics of the Warrington stadium can be seen here: http://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/news/9431361.IN_PICS__Seats_added_at_Wolves__home/?ref=mmsp Looking good!

Latest pics of the Warrington stadium can be seen here: http://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/news/9431361.IN_PICS__Seats_added_at_Wolves__home/?ref=mmsp Looking good!

Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:36 am  

looks classy

Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:40 am  

@Alex_Wolves on Twitter 360 view http://360.io/kd9KXp

@Alex_Wolves on Twitter 360 view http://360.io/kd9KXp

Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:47 am  

Horatio Yed wrote: @Alex_Wolves on Twitter 360 view http://360.io/kd9KXp Cheers for that, looks good! Wil get following him.

Horatio Yed wrote: @Alex_Wolves on Twitter 360 view http://360.io/kd9KXp Cheers for that, looks good! Wil get following him.

Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:56 am  

Gruntfuttock wrote:

What a silly thread this has turned into , with lots of symantics and "Technically" I am sure you are all very knowledgable people but it doesnt matter how "technically" we owe money on the stadium or to who , the plain fact is that Saints decide how to use it , they take the gate reciepts , they earn from many revenue streams the stadium generates , SAINTS do , not the council, not any other entity , SAINTS!! so de facto we own the stadium

Agreed.

My only problem with our stadium arrangement is not that we don't 'technically own the stadium. It is that we don't decide everything that goes on there like you can. We don't have a club shop, we can't use all the facilities at will. We can't have a proper club shop on the site. We don't get the money from the kiosks.

Anybody trying to make out we have some sort of better deal than saints in this case is deluded.

We recover from this through our rent being less than the running costs of a stadium.

Re: Stadium Developments : Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:23 pm  

Odem wrote:

My only problem with our stadium arrangement is not that we don't 'technically own the stadium. It is that we don't decide everything that goes on there like you can. We don't have a club shop, we can't use all the facilities at will. We can't have a proper club shop on the site. We don't get the money from the kiosks.

Anybody trying to make out we have some sort of better deal than saints in this case is deluded.

We recover from this through our rent being less than the running costs of a stadium.

Do you get any income from the non-sporting activities at the ground? If not, you are at a significant financial disadvantage as the club's only income is RL-related.