Re: 2013 replicas : Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:46 pm  

Another Fartown shirt with added extra squiggles/lines or gimmicks.....like the colours but there's no need for the lightning strike !!

Re: 2013 replicas : Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:13 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

If you are going to pick holes in spelling mistakes make sure you cover all the bases old lad. He are some of yours on this thread for example:-

"Are you perchance related to Jeremy Clarckson? He too mistakes his opinion for fact a lot of the time"

Who's he ? And...

"I stated they wereall SL games...they were. I fail to see the flaw?
Ah.......you're going to roll out the "regular season v play-off" stance....good luck with that"

And...

"Top 20 worst attended games......London are there 3 times (top 10 they're only there once)and not occupyng the top 5 spots as the original flatcapper was alluding to"

It was a genuine question....."elete" could well have been a norvun company selling pigeon food....

Re: 2013 replicas : Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:49 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

London have a good stadium (rented) but for club with a catchment area of millions its a lost cause. People in the London area don't want to watch live Superleague - Fact.

Given that some of these "millions" living within the M25 could still potentially be the best part of two hours travel time from The Stoop, presumably you're equally critical of Castleford for failing to attract supporters from areas such as Morpeth or Skegness? </threaddrift>

Re: 2013 replicas : Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:48 am  

gutterfax wrote:

It was a genuine question....."elete" could well have been a norvun company selling pigeon food....

Point taken. Never thought of that.

Re: 2013 replicas : Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:51 am  

bramleyrhino wrote:

Given that some of these "millions" living within the M25 could still potentially be the best part of two hours travel time from The Stoop, presumably you're equally critical of Castleford for failing to attract supporters from areas such as Morpeth or Skegness? </threaddrift>

Why would I be critical of a club that attracts 18% of its potential market ?

Re: 2013 replicas : Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:13 am  

Tigerade wrote:

Why would I be critical of a club that attracts 18% of its potential market ?

It depends how you define "potential market". If you're suggesting that London should be attracting fans in Upminster or Harold Wood, which are around 2hrs travel time from Twickenham, why are Castleford only expected to attract fans with a WF10 postcode?

Re: 2013 replicas : Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:02 am  

I thought that this was a thread about new kits.

Stop bickering like a bunch of girls or go and do it somewhere else.

Re: 2013 replicas : Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:00 am  

Are Huddersfield's away shirts deliberately sh*t or did someone actually think that was a nice kit?

Re: 2013 replicas : Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:43 am  

garyhulsefan wrote:

Are Huddersfield's away shirts deliberately sh*t or did someone actually think that was a nice kit?

Is this a serious question following Wire's gender diverse away attempt of 2013?

Re: 2013 replicas : Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:47 am  

garyhulsefan wrote:

Are Huddersfield's away shirts deliberately sh*t or did someone actually think that was a nice kit?

Probably the 1st one - and its not just saved for the away shirts, some of our home shirts in recent years have been horrendous too, we seem to have decided that we are catering for the younger market only rather than everyone.