Re: This Sintellins team..... : Fri May 23, 2014 7:56 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

Which all led to a reef that was given as a knock on - and when Wilkin repeats it's given as a knock on even though it went backwards.

Silverwood has been rubbish - but it's had absolutely no bearing on the score thus far.

Do You really believe that went backwards? he clearly stripped it and it went forward.

But i agree it hasn't had a real bearing on the result so far not like Brough's terrible performance.

Re: This Sintellins team..... : Fri May 23, 2014 7:59 pm  

dubairl wrote:

Do You really believe that went backwards? he clearly stripped it and it went forward.

But i agree it hasn't had a real bearing on the result so far not like Brough's terrible performance.

Ish, it hit his thigh and did (using the line on the pitch) go backwards - but as I've said at numerous times I've no complaints of a knock on given when a player clearly loses the ball ...

I would of used Ferres (?) sheparding the dummy runner and stopping in defence looking for a penalty ... But thought that would be a little too controversial

Re: This Sintellins team..... : Fri May 23, 2014 8:06 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

Ish, it hit his thigh and did (using the line on the pitch) go backwards - but as I've said at numerous times I've no complaints of a knock on given when a player clearly loses the ball ...

I would of used Ferres (?) sheparding the dummy runner and stopping in defence looking for a penalty ... But thought that would be a little too controversial

I would have give that a try as well but whoever was standing in the defensive line made it a no try technically.

Re: This Sintellins team..... : Fri May 23, 2014 8:18 pm  

Silverwood has been appalling tonight, but not as bad as the Giants.

Re: This Sintellins team..... : Sat May 24, 2014 7:27 am  

Ginger_Giant wrote:

Silverwood has been appalling tonight, but not as bad as the Giants.

Really bad performance from him, 5 forward passes, 2 blatant knock ons he only got 1 decision right for a forward pass.
Yet again inconsistent of calling held and moving off the mark at the play the ball on a positive note he wasn't as bad as the touch judges who don't see anything.

Re: This Sintellins team..... : Sat May 24, 2014 12:17 pm  

Judder Man wrote:

Really bad performance from him, 5 forward passes, 2 blatant knock ons he only got 1 decision right for a forward pass.
Yet again inconsistent of calling held and moving off the mark at the play the ball on a positive note he wasn't as bad as the touch judges who don't see anything.

Of course you were there and near enough to comment on these decisions. And lets face it, it definitely wasn't the players who messing about around the PTB or trying to milk penalties and generally bend/break the rules. They were all "perfect" CONSISTANTLY

Re: This Sintellins team..... : Sat May 24, 2014 1:44 pm  

saints did what they had to, which was turn up and do the basics, they were pretty average and made to look briliant by a poor effort from huddersfield, even bradford would have beaten us last night!

Re: This Sintellins team..... : Sat May 24, 2014 5:07 pm  

Ginger_Giant wrote:

Silverwood has been appalling tonight, but not as bad as the Giants.

Shush, Huddersfield were amazing. It's just that Saints were world class last night, that's why Huddersfield *looked* average.

That's what some saints fans I know said anyway. Deluded much?

Re: This Sintellins team..... : Sat May 24, 2014 9:10 pm  

WireFanatic III wrote:

Shush, Huddersfield were amazing. It's just that Saints were world class last night, that's why Huddersfield *looked* average.

That's what some saints fans I know said anyway. Deluded much?

You are very bitter towards us for some reason. Are you worried we may thump you back for the drubbing you gave us at Magic? Well, the drubbing we allowed you to give us because we were very poor and we made an average team look good anyway.

Re: This Sintellins team..... : Sat May 24, 2014 10:31 pm  

It was a pretty boring match between Hudds and Saints. Hudds were very poor indeed.