: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:14 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

If bluesox4evaaa and classycas2009 actually understood the licensing process, then maybe they would be able to construct a better argument against.

As it is, they don't really have a clue and are just making themselves look uneducated.

your right....but i am passionate about the game. And this licence system is bull poop.

Im not saying Im right or your wrong, Im not the "I know more than you" type of person.

Only part of the system i agree with, is you must a stadium that meets critia

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:19 pm  

classycas2009 wrote:

your right....but i am passionate about the game. And this licence system is bull poop.

Im not saying Im right or your wrong, Im not the "I know more than you" type of person.

Only part of the system i agree with, is you must a stadium that meets critia

If you don't understand the licensing system, how can you understand whether it is bull or not?

And why should stadiums matter if all that matters is what happens on the pitch?

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:20 pm  

[quote="Wellsy13"]If you don't understand the licensing system, how can you understand whether it is bull or not?

And why should stadiums matter if all that matters is what happens on the pitch?[/quote]

think hillsborough

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:23 pm  

bluesox4evaaa wrote:

my points are standard arguments against it you nazi

You haven't brought up one decent argument that hasn't been completely flawed. There's nothing standard about it.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:23 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

If you don't understand the licensing system, how can you understand whether it is bull or not?

And why should stadiums matter if all that matters is what happens on the pitch?

Did I say I dont understand......NO ..maybe I dont agree


So lets hear why there SHOULDNT be P/R...lets hear you

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:24 pm  

bluesox4evaaa wrote:

think hillsborough

Hillsborough had nothing to do with the standard of the stadium.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:26 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

You haven't brought up one decent argument that hasn't been completely flawed. There's nothing standard about it.

how about the point about the fact that with the absence of relegation the interest in lower table activity of super league is greatly compromised skinhead?

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:27 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

You haven't brought up one decent argument that hasn't been completely flawed. There's nothing standard about it.

And what part of the argument as been flawed?

Let me ask you a simple question for such a educated guy.

If Quinns....crowds keep falling....thier performance fall...they stop selling merchendise...etc etc...do you really think RFL will relagate them?

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:29 pm  

not if wellesy has her way. shed rather these teams be given chance after chance on the grounds of mental illness

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:33 pm  

Is this a sport forum ?