[Wildthing]

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:24 am  

Tre Cool wrote:

Wakey doesn't have one stand half as good as the south stand. How you fit 12k in BV is beyond me.

We don't. 11k is the maximum capacity at BV.

Do carry on with your rather pointless rants about our new stand though.

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:51 pm  

Nothing wrong with the Wakefield stand.

More atmosphere in there for the derby game than there has EVER been.

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 2:06 pm  

Can't please some people on here

Can't even be arsed justifying why we have made improvements.

[Wildthing]

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 2:34 pm  

Fully wrote:

Nothing wrong with the Wakefield stand.

More atmosphere in there for the derby game than there has EVER been.

Correct.

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:25 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

The southstand is cutting edge architecture to you?

No., It seemed quite strange that he should castigate us for our North Stand given the state of the South Stand at Headingley.

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:33 pm  

LyndsayGill wrote:

No., It seemed quite strange that he should castigate us for our North Stand given the state of the South Stand at Headingley.

Tell us more about the "state" of the S Stand...?

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:58 pm  

MjM wrote:

Tell us more about the "state" of the S Stand...?

If you are less than 5 foot 6 there is nothing wrong with the south stand. If on the other hand you are normal height, and stand at the back, you can't actually see the far side of the pitch because of the crap design of it.

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:12 pm  

who needs flankers? wrote:

If you are less than 5 foot 6 there is nothing wrong with the south stand. If on the other hand you are normal height, and stand at the back, you can't actually see the far side of the pitch because of the crap design of it.

Huh, I'm of normal height and have never noticed this despite standing in the thing hundreds of times, right at the back. Curious.

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:19 pm  

Tre Cool wrote:

I'd like them to at least have a stadium to play in.

If Leeds council stopped poking their noses in we might have one.

Re: Stadium Developments : Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:23 pm  

MjM wrote:

who needs flankers? wrote:

If you are less than 5 foot 6 there is nothing wrong with the south stand. If on the other hand you are normal height, and stand at the back, you can't actually see the far side of the pitch because of the crap design of it.

Huh, I'm of normal height and have never noticed this despite standing in the thing hundreds of times, right at the back. Curious.

Shorties always claim rhey're normal. The only decent stand is the new one, the rest are 'not up to SL standard'- a bit like the pitch.