Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:13 am  

gutterfax wrote:

Have no doubt he means well Dally......but he lacks certain social graces to say the least. He also continues to refer to me as a troll.......which would point to him having trouble understanding what a troll is. I suspect that my 8,000 + posts to date on these boards have been nothing less than 100% in support of League......with the occassional rant at the numpties who run quins rl.
Still, I am sure he will rip this post apart as well in the forlorn hope of looking clever

You are a troll.

You even admit to loving the rah rah in a previous existence.

As for the number of your posts, the care factor isn't high.

Most of these guys know me from previous forums.

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:14 am  

Serge A. Storms wrote:

Only 77,000 at the Harlequins v Wasps game - must have confused it with the American Football.

Free tickets Guazzini style, no doubt.

Get back to me when you hit 90,000...

Like I said, I give you another 150 years.

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:16 am  

Serge A. Storms wrote:

Only one googler on here

Glad you admit it.

Try other sources for a change.

Like the book I quoted.

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:17 am  

Serge A. Storms wrote:

That's impossible - he will always look a fool - unavoidable in his case

So says Houston chapels...



Still pretending to be a rugby league fan.

At least the Clive Woody persona was more honest. Speaking of hands on it...

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:21 am  

Serge A. Storms wrote:

Like you Dally - when did you actually attend a game? Then you would have to get job?

Tweedle dee and Tweedle dum - dum being the apt part

Don't worry, DM.

He is nearly out when he starts attacking our jobs and intellect.



Of course he has no arguments as a rah rah. They are all shredded.

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:29 am  

Serge A. Storms wrote:

Like you Dally - when did you actually attend a game? Then you would have to get job?

Tweedle dee and Tweedle dum - dum being the apt part

5 in the morning and you are thinking of me and gijou.

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:31 am  

Gijou wrote:

Don't worry, DM.

He is nearly out when he starts attacking our jobs and intellect.



Of course he has no arguments as a rah rah. They are all shredded.

mate i actually think he is a genuine league fan, but clearly also has union bias as well

hes not as untainted as you and me.

but lots of poms like union, they watch the 6 nations and get all insecure wrt to RL.

its different for us living in oz and RL rampant and union irrelevant ...

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:10 am  

Gijou wrote:

You are a troll.

You even admit to loving the rah rah in a previous existence.

Doesn't make me a troll or is RLFANS now an exclusive club for people who only watch league and not any other sport? Must have missed that announcement.

Gijou wrote:

As for the number of your posts, the care factor isn't high.

Most of these guys know me from previous forums.

so, you have multiple personality disorder then? And by these guts, I take it you refer to Dally, EA and eels fan.......bloody hell, I am suprised you haven't set up your own site.......

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:14 am  

gutterfax wrote:

Doesn't make me a troll or is RLFANS now an exclusive club for people who only watch league and not any other sport? Must have missed that announcement.

so, you have multiple personality disorder then? And by these guts, I take it you refer to Dally, EA and eels fan.......bloody hell, I am suprised you haven't set up your own site.......

OK.

You aren't a troll.

It is just a remarkable coincidence you fall on the rah rah side of the ledger whenever arguing a point.



I post under one name. Here.

I have posted at other forums but not now. Just here.

No multiple personality disorder etc. etc.

But very funny...

Re: Wellington : Tue Apr 13, 2010 9:16 am  

blaaaahh, I stick it to union cause it's fun.