: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:00 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

I'd rather not thanks, it's irrelevant ocker gobbledygook.

the st helens players dont seem to have much of a problem understanding it coming from mick potter

perhaps you should follow their lead

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:02 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

im guessing its cause you support the catalans that english isnt your first language

oh dear! id pay money to sit with you in a bar mate, quality entertainment.
where do you get ther fact that im a catalans fan from?
is it my frano botica in wigan kit avatar or the fact that ive just told you im a wigan fan?

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:03 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

OK since youve pointed out where i broke the rules, my reply is, wow, thats a really long post.

as ive said before i couldnt be bothered reading such long posts from yourself.

one line is bad enough mate.

oooh, back to tactic 1

a change up i see

1) Attack The Poster: Instead of addressing the argument that has been made, people using this method attack the person making it instead. This is particularly easy for many delusional people such as Dally. The charge made doesn't even have to be accurate,

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:05 pm  

FearTheVee wrote: Seriously, what are you on about? I wasn't making fun of NRL coaches, just Sheens' comments. Ellis picked up Tigers' players' player award http://www.weststigers.com.au/default.a ... ay&id=3913, some comments from Tigers' fans: "Garreth Ellis!!! What a buy!!!" "Ellis was a godsend." "That Ellis is a bewdy!!!" "That Ellis lacks basic skills" - hang on, no that's not on there. Those cheerleaders have bigger six packs than half the players

FearTheVee wrote: Seriously, what are you on about? I wasn't making fun of NRL coaches, just Sheens' comments. Ellis picked up Tigers' players' player award http://www.weststigers.com.au/default.a ... ay&id=3913, some comments from Tigers' fans: "Garreth Ellis!!! What a buy!!!" "Ellis was a godsend." "That Ellis is a bewdy!!!" "That Ellis lacks basic skills" - hang on, no that's not on there. Those cheerleaders have bigger six packs than half the players

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:05 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

the st helens players dont seem to have much of a problem understanding it coming from mick potter

perhaps you should follow their lead

I would think they'd have a serious problem understanding what Mick Potter has to do with Tim Sheens' opinions on Gareth Ellis.

Is your point that because my club has had Australian coaches in the past, Tim Sheens can never be mistaken? Seriously? You surely can't be making that point, that would be irrelevant and idiotic.

You're not an irrelevant idiot are you?

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:54 pm  

Sorry to move off topic here ( )...

I was bored so I looked at all the running stats of starting 2nd rows in the NRL this week. Ellis showed up well:


Carries/Meters

Thaiday (Bris): 21/145
Creagh (StG): 14/125
Ryan (Bul): 17/118
Ellis (Wests): 13/105
Minichiello (GCT): 13/103
Mannering (NZ): 14/103
Hindmarsh (Par): 11/97
Cooper (Pen): 12/96
Williams (Cro): 12/92
Laffranchi (GCT): 12/82
Tupou (Cro): 11/82
Turner (Can): 11/80
Harrison (Can): 12/78
McPherson (Sou): 10/76
Patterson (New): 8/70
Waterhouse (Pen): 8/69
Hoffman (Mel): 10/65
Warburton (Bul): 8/62
Scott (StG): 8/62
Watmough (Man): 9/59
Hauraki (Par): 6/58
Payten (Wests): 9/52
Kidwell (Sou): 7/50
Hall (Man): 6/45
T'eo (Bris): 7/40
Manuokafoa (NQ): 6/39
Fitzgibbon (Syd): 7/37
Paea (Syd): 6/38
Proctor (Mel): 4/33
Simpson (New): 5/32
Harris (NQ): 5/32
Matulino (NZ): 3/21

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:41 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

hey einstein the kiwi team consisted of players from the nrl as well bar one

Hey Einstien, what does that tell you about the NRL and the standard of the Australian players it produces if all the best player are Kiwis

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:29 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

I would think they'd have a serious problem understanding what Mick Potter has to do with Tim Sheens' opinions on Gareth Ellis.

Is your point that because my club has had Australian coaches in the past, Tim Sheens can never be mistaken? Seriously? You surely can't be making that point, that would be irrelevant and idiotic.

You're not an irrelevant idiot are you?

good to see youve worked it out

even more so that tim sheens is actually achieved stuff in the nrl unlike mick potter

tim sheens knows a hell of a lot more about RL than mick potter so you do the math

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:30 pm  

vastman wrote:

Hey Einstien, what does that tell you about the NRL and the standard of the Australian players it produces if all the best player are Kiwis

if you take the warriors out of the nrl, the kiwis would be as good as england.

saying nz won the WC isnt a negative to a fan of the nrl because they are a product of the nrl

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:48 pm  

dally messenger wrote:

if you take the warriors out of the nrl, the kiwis would be as good as england.

saying nz won the WC isnt a negative to a fan of the nrl because they are a product of the nrl

is it a negative to a fan of the australian national team?