: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:43 pm  

bluesox4evaaa wrote:

not if wellesy has her way. shed rather these teams be given chance after chance on the grounds of mental illness

Are you really that desperate that you have to start acting sexist to make yourself feel superior? I know you're failing to bring up a decent argument, but I didn't think you needed to sink THAT low!

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:44 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

The RFL wouldn't need to. They'd probably go bust.

The fact is, they meet the criteria in a lot of areas and are deserving of their franchise.

OMG ..o.k they stop meeting the critia in any fu***g shape or form then...stop trying to twist your argument

or lets just say halifax meet more critia points than Quinns/Wigan etc...would RFL swap them places ?

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:44 pm  

littlerich wrote:

For God's sake STOP throwing this back into these arguments. I don't want to read it. It was 6 years ago. SIX ! Let it go.


bluesox4evaaa - shut the f**k up ! You're forcing people to drag up the horrid past of Halifax RLFC. You're also embarrassing yourself. Enough already. Enough.

I am certainly not. in fact i am thoroughly enjoying this.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:45 pm  

littlerich wrote:

For God's sake STOP throwing this back into these arguments. I don't want to read it. It was 6 years ago. SIX ! Let it go.

Sorry, I had no intention of bringing up a bad part of your history to embarrass you!

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:46 pm  

If your ansrew is no...then this is just not the way forward....if you answer yes...I think you lieing to yourself

If they would then yes...maybe this is the way forward, but in a realistic world of RFL thats not going to happen is it?

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:47 pm  

Red Red Robin wrote:

If a club does all of that they will get a license. It was said by Nigel Wood that the best performing NL club will get a license.

On or Off pitch , and who makes that decision ?

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:48 pm  

bluesox4evaaa wrote:

I am certainly not. in fact i am thoroughly enjoying this.

........... your lack of substance and basic grasp of reality is making your contributions embarrassing. It's a bit cringeworthy to be honest.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:49 pm  

Wellsy13 wrote:

Are you really that desperate that you have to start acting sexist to make yourself feel superior? I know you're failing to bring up a decent argument, but I didn't think you needed to sink THAT low!

going with a womans argument on this issue would be more dangerous than allowing a monkey to fly a plane

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:49 pm  

classycas2009 wrote:

OMG ..o.k they stop meeting the critia in any fu***g shape or form then...stop trying to twist your argument

or lets just say halifax meet more critia points than Quinns/Wigan etc...would RFL swap them places ?

I aren't trying to twist anything. You're trying to bring up a completely hypothetical argument that you cannot prove right or wrong, so no matter what I reply you will still disagree with. What's the point?

If Wigan, Saints or anyone in the SL didn't meet ANY criteria to be in SL, then I guarantee that they would not be in the SL. Anyone that is trying to argue that they would despite not meeting ANY criteria is simply idiotic.

: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:49 pm  

bluesox4evaaa wrote:

i meant the team that gets stuck up in SL

It'll count against them in the next round of license applications.