NRL now has a future strategy specialist. Why not the RFL? : Sat Feb 07, 2015 10:44 am
Read this.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/phil-ro ... e070f10416 I agree with Shane Richardson 100% about expansion, a shorter club season, and the three new teams needed in the NRL. We need to have the same kind of person in the RFL with the same rational expansion vision. At the moment the RFL has no expansion strategy, and has demonstrated no future vision of any kind. The NRL will probably get even more money on its next TV deal. It will be totally rolling in money, and with the expansion of the number of NRL clubs all the best SL players will go to the NRL in 2018. With the current insular, status quo M-62 leadership, and P & R instead of licencing, the RFL will never get the increased funding that the game desperately needs to attract more followers and to flourish. Shane Richardson should be made Head of Strategic Planning at the RLIF, on a part time basis, to complement his NRL function. That would kick Nigel Wood up the bum about the future of the RFL. |
Read this.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/phil-ro ... e070f10416 I agree with Shane Richardson 100% about expansion, a shorter club season, and the three new teams needed in the NRL. We need to have the same kind of person in the RFL with the same rational expansion vision. At the moment the RFL has no expansion strategy, and has demonstrated no future vision of any kind. The NRL will probably get even more money on its next TV deal. It will be totally rolling in money, and with the expansion of the number of NRL clubs all the best SL players will go to the NRL in 2018. With the current insular, status quo M-62 leadership, and P & R instead of licencing, the RFL will never get the increased funding that the game desperately needs to attract more followers and to flourish. Shane Richardson should be made Head of Strategic Planning at the RLIF, on a part time basis, to complement his NRL function. That would kick Nigel Wood up the bum about the future of the RFL. |
|