Re: Taulima Tautai : Thu Jun 13, 2019 1:29 pm  

Ruune Rebellion wrote:

Because Hardaker is their best player and the same reason why Leeds never got rid

At least Castleford had the balls to do the right thing

But Leeds did get rid didn't they?

Re: Taulima Tautai : Thu Jun 13, 2019 2:17 pm  

homme vaste wrote: But Leeds did get rid didn't they? Here you go Runebwoi https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/40418387

homme vaste wrote: But Leeds did get rid didn't they? Here you go Runebwoi https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/40418387

Re: Taulima Tautai : Thu Jun 13, 2019 2:43 pm  

On his 3rd or 4th indiscretion.

Re: Taulima Tautai : Thu Jun 13, 2019 3:13 pm  

Willzay wrote:

Agree completely but why haven’t they done the same for Hardaker.

See my final sentence...

Re: Taulima Tautai : Thu Jun 13, 2019 3:18 pm  

Again, nothing has been decided as to his punishment yet, the club may stand by him as they did Hardaker, and Mullen, who also hasn't been fired. If he does have his contract terminated it probably has more to do with his possible deportation than his ability.

Re: Taulima Tautai : Thu Jun 13, 2019 3:23 pm  

If the same happened at Leeds as it did at Cas I could not see Leeds action been any different - They would of got rid.

I also think had the incidents that happened whilst at Leeds happened at Cas, I don`t think Cas would have got rid of him either. There is a big difference in the fact that he was to be banned for what was to be 2 years at the time, I don`t think Cas can take the moral high ground here over Leeds.

Talent should not come in to the decision on action to be taken by the club against player, but it does and unfortunately we know it always will do.

Re: Taulima Tautai : Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:12 pm  

homme vaste wrote:

If the same happened at Leeds as it did at Cas I could not see Leeds action been any different - They would of got rid.

I also think had the incidents that happened whilst at Leeds happened at Cas, I don`t think Cas would have got rid of him either. There is a big difference in the fact that he was to be banned for what was to be 2 years at the time, I don`t think Cas can take the moral high ground here over Leeds.

Talent should not come in to the decision on action to be taken by the club against player, but it does and unfortunately we know it always will do.

Players are assets. If a club signs a player for £150k, they don't want to sack them, then see another club pick them up for free as soon as their ban is up. Hardaker shafted Cas in that way.

[SouthStander.com]

Re: Taulima Tautai : Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:41 pm  

Talk in the media that Tautai might be deported for admitting the charge and being convicted in court today.

Re: Taulima Tautai : Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:12 pm  

homme vaste wrote:

If the same happened at Leeds as it did at Cas I could not see Leeds action been any different - They would of got rid.

I also think had the incidents that happened whilst at Leeds happened at Cas, I don`t think Cas would have got rid of him either. There is a big difference in the fact that he was to be banned for what was to be 2 years at the time, I don`t think Cas can take the moral high ground here over Leeds.

Talent should not come in to the decision on action to be taken by the club against player, but it does and unfortunately we know it always will do.

If I owned a rugby club and one of my players broke into someone’s house to batter then I would have sacked him on the spot. Leeds never. Just like they stood by those 2 idiots when they got jailed. Leeds rugby league have no morals. Fact

Re: Taulima Tautai : Fri Jun 14, 2019 10:20 pm  

No morals eh? Remind me who your player of the season was last year and if any other team has a statue of a proven drug cheat outside their ground?