Board index ‹ Welcome to RLFANS ‹ The Virtual Terrace ‹ Great selfless act by SBW's

Huddersfield1895 wrote:

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/sbw-joins-rugby-stars-in-raising-funds-to-tackle-samoas-measles-outbreak/news-story/1b82aa0ad6865534a18ce923f43545d5

SBW is a great human being and we are all blessed to have him playing soon in Super League for the mighty Toronto Wolfpack.

Who apart from what appears to be an OP who’s yet another Jean clone, what’s so selfless about this act.

Millions of people give as much and in many cases well more than SBW, he’s hardly a saint. This pathetic attempt to big up your latest love interest is cringe worthy even for you, take a break luv.

Another clickbait article from a troll.

JEAN CAPDOUZE wrote:

SBW is a great human being and we are all blessed to have him playing soon in Super League for the mighty Toronto Wolfpack.

Fishermanscap wrote:

Who apart from what appears to be an OP who’s yet another Jean clone, what’s so selfless about this act.

Millions of people give as much and in many cases well more than SBW, he’s hardly a saint. This pathetic attempt to big up your latest love interest is cringe worthy even for you, take a break luv.

Well said.....

Fishermans endless crap wrote:

Who apart from what appears to be an OP who’s yet another Jean clone, what’s so selfless about this act.

Millions of people give as much and in many cases well more than SBW, he’s hardly a saint. ....

When someone gives his money to a good cause, and receives nothing of material value in return, that is an example of a selfless act. Even if someone else gives more money, it is irrelevant to the fact that the act of giving when receiving nothing in return is a selfless act. You should try it some time.

JEAN CAPDOUZE wrote:

When someone gives his money to a good cause, and receives nothing of material value in return, that is an example of a selfless act. Even if someone else gives more money, it is irrelevant to the fact that the act of giving when receiving nothing in return is a selfless act. You should try it some time.

then why don't you take up that bet for charity then

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=627012&start=70

JEAN CAPDOUZE wrote:

You should try it some time.

...as the orphans of Kiev can testify, Jean is a true bastion of charity in the mold of St Vincent De Paul and Mother Theresa

JEAN CAPDOUZE wrote:

When someone gives his money to a good cause, and receives nothing of material value in return, that is an example of a selfless act. Even if someone else gives more money, it is irrelevant to the fact that the act of giving when receiving nothing in return is a selfless act. You should try it some time.

How do you know I don’t? Isn’t that the point, millions give time and money without any desire for recognition. On the other hand not celebrities di it to virtue signal or even more pathetically have someone virtue signal on there behalf.

In this case I’m not actually questioning SBWs motives I’m questioning yours! My verdict is that you are truly tragic even for a look at me troll.