QuoteFLAT STANLEY="FLAT STANLEY"I don't know the comparisons of how much both clubs have spent but i bet its not that much difference or on par with Wakey's'"
Carter was interviewed earlier in the season and said we were probably circa £1.6m.
But wouldn't this be stifled anyway replacing Lui with Lee in the halves.
I know we had to mix things up against Cas, but would that be the preferred option than playing Niall at the back, who knows the coaching staff know best.
To be honest. I think that one of the reasons why Sheens has kept Lee at hooker is because of his workrate. We simply can't replace or afford to lose his valued contribution, if Lee played at No 6 a big void will be left wanting which Tomkins simply couldn't fill. I see no problem changing this in the second half if things aren't going to plan, but i think its wise for Lee to start at No 9 due to his valued workrate that can't be replaced.
I hold my hands up on my criticism of Tommy Lee, this year he looks a new player. I think Evalds will go to FB but agree about GOB at FB. Wonder if we would play evalds at SO as the running back which Liu is? Can't see it happening. Think we all know the starting line-up, would love to see forster in for Joseph tho, who doesn't look good enough for this league.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
