Re: Simon Orange : Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:24 pm  

Really?
Sale seem alot more professional than we are and if they really wanted to poach staff etc I don't think they'd need to buy us out and then wind up the club?

With regards to single occupancy I think our tennancy extension agreement runs out in 2018 and if MK did leave we would fold and cease to exist in the top teir so any agreements etc go with the club.
Leaving all the staff etc ripe for the picking, so again why would they buy them out just to wind up the club, surely let the club do that themselves?
Just can't see your logic of buying the club to then finish it.

Re: Simon Orange : Thu Jul 14, 2016 4:55 pm  

Beggars ..... choosers , as the saying goes .

to blink out of existence or playing a subservient other team role?

Re: Simon Orange : Fri Jul 15, 2016 2:20 pm  

Sale just released their new Board of Directors, so who do you actually think they would need to poach and what assets are there to strip? http://www.salesharks.com/news/3841.php#.V4jlEEDTVSD the council and Peel need nearly £25m out of the stadium to break even and it currently isn't worth half that. they need to sell the plots first so they can claim they got all their money back or the fallout for the council would be huge. {Although with the CEO of Allied London (who seem to be rebuilding half of Manchester), there may be some development deals possible)

Sale just released their new Board of Directors, so who do you actually think they would need to poach and what assets are there to strip? http://www.salesharks.com/news/3841.php#.V4jlEEDTVSD the council and Peel need nearly £25m out of the stadium to break even and it currently isn't worth half that. they need to sell the plots first so they can claim they got all their money back or the fallout for the council would be huge. {Although with the CEO of Allied London (who seem to be rebuilding half of Manchester), there may be some development deals possible)

Re: Simon Orange : Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:00 pm  

That is one serious set of directors.
Explains why our game (as an entity) is miles behind RU.

Imagine that set of directors running RL

Re: Simon Orange : Fri Jul 15, 2016 5:05 pm  

Hillbilly_Red wrote:

That is one serious set of directors.
Explains why our game (as an entity) is miles behind RU.

Imagine that set of directors running RL

Let's not be greedy, a couple of them would do!

Re: Simon Orange : Fri Jul 15, 2016 7:48 pm  

When we were in the doo doo back in 2012 wasn't it claimed at the time that Ged Mason from Morson was a Salford fan?

Re: Simon Orange : Fri Jul 15, 2016 9:21 pm  

Kiyan wrote: Sale just released their new Board of Directors, so who do you actually think they would need to poach and what assets are there to strip? http://www.salesharks.com/news/3841.php#.V4jlEEDTVSD the council and Peel need nearly £25m out of the stadium to break even and it currently isn't worth half that. they need to sell the plots first so they can claim they got all their money back or the fallout for the council would be huge. {Although with the CEO of Allied London (who seem to be rebuilding half of Manchester), there may be some development deals possible) Frightening not just for Salford but for the other top union clubs, looks like they really mean business.

Kiyan wrote: Sale just released their new Board of Directors, so who do you actually think they would need to poach and what assets are there to strip? http://www.salesharks.com/news/3841.php#.V4jlEEDTVSD the council and Peel need nearly £25m out of the stadium to break even and it currently isn't worth half that. they need to sell the plots first so they can claim they got all their money back or the fallout for the council would be huge. {Although with the CEO of Allied London (who seem to be rebuilding half of Manchester), there may be some development deals possible) Frightening not just for Salford but for the other top union clubs, looks like they really mean business.