Michigan red wrote:
filesy wrote:
i would imagine that if wakey wernt to get a franchise on tuesday Glen Morrison would be looking for a new club who i think would be a great replacement for phil bailey.
Yeah but he's no good to us as he can't train Tuesdays when he has to go and collect his pension
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
There's nood good reason to go assett stripping Wakey when/if they lose the franchise as if all there players were that good they would'nt be in the position at the bottom of the league they are.
That Joel Moon by all accounts is a good un but isn't a fan of playing in the centres, think Ratchfords decision on a new contract will a big influence on recruitment as if he stays there is a qorld class young back we don't need to replce.
Are we not able to put Fek and Anderson on the open market without a fee involved? I'd rather see 3 brand new props brought in and then find another hooker and centre if Williams turns out to be the long term answer for the other winger.
Morrison could prove a big mistake, I'd rather see a younger player come in. I think he would be step in the wrong direction, despite his obvious quality. Infact, if i'd won that £161m on the euro-millions last week, Anderson's contract would have been packed up and he'd have been out of the club. We knew Feka was going to be liability in defence, but Anderson is proving just as bad, if not worse than Feka. The amount of times he's completely missed tackles and we've let in tries is ridiculous. It must be at least twice a game, every game, and he's costing us far too many points. A real shame because he was always one of my favorite players, prior to his arrival at the Willows.
We just can't afford to play both of them in the same team. It's one thing the backs getting targetted, it's another when the opposition target our forwards.