: Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:49 pm  

Hicks Is Gunna Score wrote:

But you know as well as I do that as soon as Reardon is fit he will come in for him, and for me that is more solid than having Riley at fullback.

Why should Reardon just come straight into the team though? he has been out for a long time now, and I think that Riley has been great in the first 2 games at full back so far this season.

Hicks Is Gunna Score wrote:

Based on the performances on last season Riley deserves a place on the wing but he wouldn't be my first, or even second choice fullback. I would swap him and Hicks around.

Swapping Riley and Hicks around is a terrible idea. Hicks is needed on the wing as he is a very good winger who scores tries (I'm not saying that Riley wouldn't) and when he plays at full back he doesn't score as many tries and he doesn't get involved enough for my liking.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:38 pm  

oli30045 wrote:

Thats harsh, Wakefield haven't even played this weekend yet...

2 points:

1) That one's name is spelt Reilly.

2) He doesn't play for Wakefield

HTH

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:47 pm  

JWP wrote:

That's my new favourite phrase.

When describing Warringtons defensive line, it's the 'Disgrace Line' with Riley as our last line of disgrace.

I like it.

Made me laugh, too, think that one could catch on...

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:05 pm  

Robbie Rotten wrote:

:lol:

Made me laugh, too, think that one could catch on...

On the other point, I thought Carvell played with some heart last night. Give him a few weeks though the coaches will soon sort that out.