Re: Rumours 2 : Tue Apr 10, 2018 4:30 pm
Wires71 wrote: We have Roger Draper to thank for that amendment. "We’ve also relaxed the rules regarding returning talent because I found it strange that when I came into this role there were some high-profile ex-rugby league players in union who wanted to come back but couldn’t because of our rules and regulations. That’s strange. We want some of those players returning.” https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/ ... yers-codes Think he’s talking there about the 100% dispensation for RU players who have never played RL and the 50% dispensation for players who have been out of the game for more than 5 years? (Which Charnley doesn’t qualify for) Are we saying that there was an amendment to that since allowing the signing of Charnley? Would be interested to read that - doesn’t appear in the operating rules last time I checked? Any news article link? |
Wires71 wrote: We have Roger Draper to thank for that amendment. "We’ve also relaxed the rules regarding returning talent because I found it strange that when I came into this role there were some high-profile ex-rugby league players in union who wanted to come back but couldn’t because of our rules and regulations. That’s strange. We want some of those players returning.” https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/ ... yers-codes Think he’s talking there about the 100% dispensation for RU players who have never played RL and the 50% dispensation for players who have been out of the game for more than 5 years? (Which Charnley doesn’t qualify for) Are we saying that there was an amendment to that since allowing the signing of Charnley? Would be interested to read that - doesn’t appear in the operating rules last time I checked? Any news article link? |
|