[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

Re: Westwood v Hock : Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:11 pm  

dont need him, we've got waterhouse, who's coming into his own now.

Re: Westwood v Hock : Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:11 pm  

1905 wrote:

If you hadn't edited your original post you would be able to see quite clearly why I did it.

Originaly you wrote;

You then changed it to;

You changed it AFTER I took exception to what you had said about Super Ben. So you obviously do know why I chose to insult you. Far from 'never knowing' you knew all along.

Why am I having to explain this to the person that wrote it?

Your assumption could be wrong; maybe the post was change for the sake of clarification. Just a though, so no need to get nasty.

Re: Westwood v Hock : Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:28 pm  

pies-r-us wrote:

Your assumption could be wrong; maybe the post was change for the sake of clarification. Just a though, so no need to get nasty.

Exactly, I edited my post for clarification.

I am still left wondering why somebody who doesn't know who I am, has never seen me and knows nothing about me would come to the conclusion that I am a horrible person.

Re: Westwood v Hock : Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:38 pm  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

Exactly, I edited my post for clarification.

I am still left wondering why somebody who doesn't know who I am, has never seen me and knows nothing about me would come to the conclusion that I am a horrible person.

You are not a horrible person, you are a horrible giraffe.

[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

Re: Westwood v Hock : Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:45 pm  

Alright, calm down now girls, lets move on.

Re: Westwood v Hock : Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:09 pm  

Tomkins
Hall
Reed
Atkins
Briscoe
Widdop
Lomax
Graham
Roby
Burgess
Westwood
Hock
O'loughlian

Burrow
Hill
Luke Burgess
Ellis

Westwood has always outplayed Ellis in an England jersey in my opinion and Hock is just the kind of player that could really get under the aussie's skin. danny brough should be nowhere near an england team!! atkins just edges watkins at the moment but give him time and watkins will be awesome should he stay fit!!

Re: Westwood v Hock : Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:35 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

Exactly, I edited my post for clarification.

I am still left wondering why somebody who doesn't know who I am, has never seen me and knows nothing about me would come to the conclusion that I am a horrible person.

I’m sure you’re not, some people on here wright things just to offend others; it should be water off a duck’s back. Just make your point and move on, they will. Good luck!

Re: Westwood v Hock : Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:08 am  

thelinesman wrote:

Agreed

Having spoken to him once i found him to be a really decent guy.

I spoke to him in Perpignan last year and he asked me what time our game kicked off! Thoroughly nice guy, stayed around for ages while fans had their picture taken with him. Horrible on the field, gent off it.

Re: Westwood v Hock : Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:26 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

I'm not going to get into an argument over this. It is silly. Perhaps I chose the wrong words, or missed a few words out, to put my point across properly. You have pounced on it like a dog with a bone. Chill out pal!

Truce.

Perhaps I over reacted, but perhaps you don’t understand just how highly SB* is regarded by those that are ‘Wire’. You’re lucky I’m not a mod. I’d have banned you if even one of your words, syllables, or phonemes cast any aspersions as to his character

*SB = Super Ben

It goes something like this;
Super, Super Ben
Super, Super Ben
Super, super Ben
Super Benny Westwood.

Re: Westwood v Hock : Tue Aug 14, 2012 3:04 am  

he's big, he's round.
he's just sniffed half a pound,
gaz hock, gaz hock!


doesn't roll of the tongue as well does it?