: Thu May 28, 2009 11:33 am  

heres this weekends h.caps
-10 feath v leigh +10
-12 wigan v salford +12
-12 barrow v sheff +12
+50 g.head v saints -50
-4 hull kr v wire +4
+6 celtic v wakey -6
+10 batley v widnes -10
-32 w.haven v donny +32
-8 hudds v cas +8
-46 keighley v worky +46
+48 l.skols v hunslet -48
-10 swint v r.dale +10
+14 york v dewsbury -14


fancy
wire +4
hudds -8
hunslet -48

: Thu May 28, 2009 11:34 am  

Wire +4 looks a bit tasty, ive been saying for weeks that they will win on Saturday but even if they don't i cant see many points being in it.

: Thu May 28, 2009 12:12 pm  

Seb,stop acting like a woodbine.What has top 5 earners got to do with my reasoning.For the hard of understanding,Im saying that if Leeds bought player"A" its because they think he has the desired qualities to play upto the level that Leeds demand and the same comment goes for Celtic.

As for your half back rubbish,say Long and Pryce were injured,do you then think that Eastmond and say Clough,would'nt be good enough to step?Burrow never played for Leeds the other night,by your reasoning then,Sinfied is crap and not good enough to play for Leeds.

And as for this top 5 earners,until a few weeks ago,Matt King and Michael Monaghan had lynch mobs after them.both re top 5 earners and neither has proved to be money well spent.

I have my own opinions and reasonings,it seems Seb lacks these qualities and acts like a sheep and follows the crowd.

: Thu May 28, 2009 12:18 pm  

Live Wired wrote:

Seb,stop acting like a woodbine.What has top 5 earners got to do with my reasoning.For the hard of understanding,Im saying that if Leeds bought player"A" its because they think he has the desired qualities to play upto the level that Leeds demand and the same comment goes for Celtic.

As for your half back rubbish,say Long and Pryce were injured,do you then think that Eastmond and say Clough,would'nt be good enough to step?Burrow never played for Leeds the other night,by your reasoning then,Sinfied is crap and not good enough to play for Leeds.

And as for this top 5 earners,until a few weeks ago,Matt King and Michael Monaghan had lynch mobs after them.both re top 5 earners and neither has proved to be money well spent.

I have my own opinions and reasonings,it seems Seb lacks these qualities and acts like a sheep and follows the crowd.

I understand your points but look at it this way:-

If all of Saints squad developed 'the shits' after a particularly dodgy curry, they would be forced to play their reserves/academy players. By your logic, that wouldn't have ANY impact on either Saints prospects of winning or the betting. Surely you must agree that this is a ridiculous position to take?

Team and injury news is a big factor. It affects what players are playing. Most of the time, the players affect the result more than any other factor.

: Thu May 28, 2009 12:35 pm  

Live Wired wrote:

As for your half back rubbish,say Long and Pryce were injured,do you then think that Eastmond and say Clough,would'nt be good enough to step?

You telling me that Clough and Eastmond are as good as Long and Pryce

: Thu May 28, 2009 1:05 pm  

Maybe not atm,but the Saints board seem to think they could be and by my reading and viewing of them upto now,the saints board look to be proven correct.

Do you think Briers and Monaghan would be deemed good enough to play for Saints? Answer no.....

Ian;
If all the players came down ill,then saints board could apply to the league and have the game cancelled.

: Thu May 28, 2009 5:18 pm  

Latchford Wolvesfan wrote:

You telling me that Clough and Eastmond are as good as Long and Pryce

Clough is better then either play in his normal position but that is all.

Why would any mention Clough in the same light as Pryce and Long when there different kind of players in different postions..

Lets just all stop moaning about who's right and who's wrong and lets start making cash.. Livewired if you make money the way you do then by all means continue your betting patterns, If we all think he is mad for doing so then he's mad BUT ITS ALL ABOUT MAKING PROFIT on way or another..

: Fri May 29, 2009 12:34 pm  

Another close game to call.

£22 Warrington +4 @ 10/11.

: Fri May 29, 2009 1:49 pm  

Huddersfield -6 with Stan James looks a good bet to me.

Castleford are without Brent Sherwin, this makes a huge difference.

: Fri May 29, 2009 4:01 pm  

FireWire wrote:

Huddersfield -6 with Stan James looks a good bet to me.

Castleford are without Brent Sherwin, this makes a huge difference.

Nah, apparently not. Apparently, they'll be able to put one of their second rowers in at 7 and won't notice any difference at all.