Winslade's Offload wrote:
It's tempting to compare the two because of their pace, but early doors Ashton seems to be a rather different animal. First off he can be trusted at FB. I don't think anybody would be bothered about him leaking tries if you swapped him with Ratchford. He looks a bit awkward going up for the high kick but you can see by the way he attacks the ball that he expects to get it and that he can mentally block out opposition runners. His action and timing are not as smooth as King or Ratchford but that will come with practice hopefully. He already seems to have learned about nicking the ball and I suspect it will not be too long before he can get his body under the ball to snuff out a try. Then there is his tackling. You would expect this to be a weak point because of his build, but he is actually quite aggressive. He doesn't just wait and ,accept the runner, or go for his legs, he seems to be up for the confrontation. I don't think we saw these features with Penny, although he was much better at dealing with the high ball when he returned to us from Swinton.
It's too soon to say, but I think his confidence, attitude and all round ability seem to be couple of steps up from Penny.
Well I think he has the advantage, like Chris Hill did, of coming in somewhat 'battle hardened' from the championship, in the way that players who come up from the Academy don't. He will have had old pros trying to take his head off and spectators shouting at him that he's poop so he will have had to learn skills to survive and thrive.
But its a small sample size and we don't know how effective he will be when teams have tape on him. Blake Austin for his first few games looked like Man of Steel. He's been good, on and off, since then, but he hasn't dominated like he did in his first games.