Re: This week’s disciplinary : Wed Apr 03, 2024 1:52 pm  

Captain Hook wrote:

They are still apoplectic over 1 refereeing decision from about 5 years ago…

"apoplectic" ... that's another good word.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Wed Apr 03, 2024 2:05 pm  

Smiffy27 wrote:

"apoplectic" ... that's another good word.

Readers Digest “Improve your word power” is to blame Smiffy!

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Wed Apr 03, 2024 2:09 pm  

Captain Hook wrote:

Readers Digest “Improve your word power” is to blame Smiffy!

Do you read it or swallow it? It is all very impressive & puts our forum above most of the others.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Wed Apr 03, 2024 2:12 pm  

Actually the odd touch of whimsicality*does set us apart


*have I gone too far yet?
Probably should be “whimsy” but I’m feeling reckless

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Apr 08, 2024 3:00 pm  

Anything released for this week yet? I sort of expect Currie to cop a ban since it's cup week, we're playing that lot, and the referee didn't even deem it worth penalising on Friday. RFL logic!

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Apr 08, 2024 3:09 pm  

Here we go... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... view-panel Currie got a ÂŁ250 fine for something the ref didn't even think was worth a penalty. Ah well, he'll recoup that by getting Man of the Match* on Sunday! * Why do they insist on calling it 'Player of the match' even on men's games? Does Konrad Hurrell identify as a woman?

Here we go... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... view-panel Currie got a ÂŁ250 fine for something the ref didn't even think was worth a penalty. Ah well, he'll recoup that by getting Man of the Match* on Sunday! * Why do they insist on calling it 'Player of the match' even on men's games? Does Konrad Hurrell identify as a woman?

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Apr 08, 2024 3:20 pm  

* Why do they insist on calling it 'Player of the match'

Indeed - but it’s still �man of steel’ not �player of brass’ (or whichever alloy you identify with). Actually, come to think of it, player of brass just makes you sound like the horn section…

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Apr 08, 2024 4:21 pm  

matt_wire wrote: Here we go... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... view-panel Currie got a £250 fine for something the ref didn't even think was worth a penalty. Ah well, he'll recoup that by getting Man of the Match* on Sunday! * Why do they insist on calling it 'Player of the match' even on men's games? Does Konrad Hurrell identify as a woman? Don’t understand what the issue is with “player of the match” it’s the best payer, not the best man (which could be based on looks/physique etcetc

matt_wire wrote: Here we go... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... view-panel Currie got a £250 fine for something the ref didn't even think was worth a penalty. Ah well, he'll recoup that by getting Man of the Match* on Sunday! * Why do they insist on calling it 'Player of the match' even on men's games? Does Konrad Hurrell identify as a woman? Don’t understand what the issue is with “player of the match” it’s the best payer, not the best man (which could be based on looks/physique etcetc

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:45 pm  

matt_wire wrote:

* Why do they insist on calling it 'Player of the match' even on men's games? Does Konrad Hurrell identify as a woman?

It is because Man Of The Match is trademarked, and when the trademark got purchased by a new owner in 2012 they started to properly enforce it.

Re: This week’s disciplinary : Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:06 am  

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... view-panel

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... view-panel