JOHN WOODS IS GOD wrote:

My bug bear with all this the high walk up ticket prices is it 1 to recoup money to pay for this season's shambles or 2 to penalize fans for not purchasing a season ticket.Also if we are struggling for money why was the decision made to pay players contracts in full last season and not to furlong ? DB is always quick to blame the fans for poor management decisions

I agree the price is high , but I’ve been told one reason is to pay for the extra stewarding , especially when 4 stands are open .

[atomic]

JOHN WOODS IS GOD wrote:

My bug bear with all this the high walk up ticket prices is it 1 to recoup money to pay for this season's shambles or 2 to penalize fans for not purchasing a season ticket.Also if we are struggling for money why was the decision made to pay players contracts in full last season and not to furlong ? DB is always quick to blame the fans for poor management decisions

I wish I could find an answer to disagree with your comment. But I can’t.

JOHN WOODS IS GOD wrote:

My bug bear with all this the high walk up ticket prices is it 1 to recoup money to pay for this season's shambles or 2 to penalize fans for not purchasing a season ticket.Also if we are struggling for money why was the decision made to pay players contracts in full last season and not to furlong ? DB is always quick to blame the fans for poor management decisions

you could have 3 games at £25 each

what decisions have fans been blamed for

satanicmills wrote:

you could have 3 games at £25 each

what decisions have fans been blamed for

couldnt make one of them so £75 for 2 games is even dearer

JOHN WOODS IS GOD wrote:

My bug bear with all this the high walk up ticket prices is it 1 to recoup money to pay for this season's shambles or 2 to penalize fans for not purchasing a season ticket.Also if we are struggling for money why was the decision made to pay players contracts in full last season and not to furlong ? DB is always quick to blame the fans for poor management decisions

Maybe DB was un aware of the furlong rules, i have just googled them as it finds nothing!

knockonknockon wrote:

couldnt make one of them so £75 for 2 games is even dearer

well it would have been £60 wouldnt it

satanicmills wrote:

well it would have been £60 wouldnt it

it would but thats the argument isnt it paying £30 a go if you cant make all 3 there is no benefit so whats your point

EVO105 wrote:

Maybe DB was un aware of the furlong rules, i have just googled them as it finds nothing!

If you Google ‘furlong’ it will show it has 220yds, ‘furlough’ may be a better option.

atomic wrote:

I wish I could find an answer to disagree with your comment. But I can’t.

very unusual for you that