leytherjay wrote:
Think Mort could make a good No6......worked with Turley.
F/B has to be Donlan.......so that means that Mort has to go wimg or be given a shot at 6.
F/B has to be Donlan.......so that means that Mort has to go wimg or be given a shot at 6.
This seems to have now become a massive problem, and as such as now become a weekly debate. I now feel obliged to air my view...
Mort as a junior player predominately played hooker, upon gaining height he moved into the full back position, a position which he played in until his transgression to stand off.
At the age of 16 he played in the Service Area squad as a 9, and that team imo was awesome, with the likes of Scott Moore, Sean Gleeson, Dean Hatton, Thomas Coyle, Chris Hill, Mike Morrison, etc.
How do i know this? Because i was involved in this particular era of Leigh Miners and thus took an interest in the Service Area Team.
Mort signed academy forms at the age of 15 with Leigh, and played his first game with the 18's at the age of 16, they put him in at full back due to the abundance of talent at 6. In his position of full back he very much impressed. As such this tag as stuck.
As an active observer of Rugby League, i am always interested in the development of these young players, and as such i am particularly amazed at thier constant achievements in this game. It's called seeing the big picture ( and believe me..I have no wish to patronise )
Now back to the origin.....Either develop Mort as a full back, or drop him through no apparent reason?
Play him from the start as a stand off....And if he bombs? Well..Then drop him.
Play Donlan at full back, Mort on the wing.......Not his position.
Or move him on?
Quite a problem really isn't it? Or is it? Kid who scores for fun, and who loves the club, takes pride in the club, and wishes to play for no other club......Once again, how do i know this? Because i was involved in thier development, not just Mort, but all the above mentioned and more.
Very Difficult indeed......