Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:59 pm  

Fylde_Warrior wrote:

No trolling. I leave that to others. I participate in genuine discussions.

Leigh were awful tonight. Yes they are part time and yes the League is part time but as last week showed the garbage Leigh put up is not even good enough v the leading 'professionals in a part time League. To talk about that Leigh team tonight in the same breadth as Sheffield, Featherston and Halifax is an insult to those teams.

The Leigh team tonight were an insult to some great Leigh teams of the past and we do not have to go back to 1981 and beyond. Even in 2002, Leight had class players and quality across their team. Many of the Leigh players tonight did not even look conditioned for amateur RL.

Unlike you Jenky. I am happy with my own club BUT far more conserned about the bigger picture of RL in general. Insularity and ignoring what is staring you in the face appears to be your remit sadly.

Nope, you are a troll (a bit better than the usual average ones we get, I'll give you that) but your trolling is quite easy to see .

I'm sure as your worried about RL in general you'll agree that for Sam Tomkins to ever fulfil his true potential he must move with haste to Australia as stagnating in SL playing one sided games each week is a waste of such a talent, in fact I think Charnley should do the same.

Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:02 am  

Fylde_Warrior wrote:

He came back on also. It was his debut and was he not better than anybody playing prop for Leigh tonight. Did he win the collision, make the hard yards, make tackles.

Are you sure ? , Parker played his tripe out .

Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:03 am  

You really are off with the fairies

Any young 'un coming into a SDL team as strong as Wigan could be eased in, and look the part!

You want to read Lee Radfords piece in the Hull Daily Mail, of which, i might add, Sam Tomkins said in his Twitter account he agreed with, before you make an even BIGGER fool of yourself

Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:08 am  

tiswallace wrote:

Are you sure ? , Parker played his tripe out .

No doubting his effort but apart from his try he struggled and should be retired and coaching. He was an excellent player bar some illegal challenges but his day has long since gone.

Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:08 am  

JENKY wrote:

Nope, you are a troll (a bit better than the usual average ones we get, I'll give you that) but your trolling is quite easy to see .

I'm sure as your worried about RL in general you'll agree that for Sam Tomkins to ever fulfil his true potential he must move with haste to Australia as stagnating in SL playing one sided games each week is a waste of such a talent, in fact I think Charnley should do the same.

Have to agree with that Jenky , there's no point of them staying in the SL playing one sided games every week , If they want to prove their worth then they need to try their hand in the NRL , then we'll see how good they are .

Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:12 am  

Just sussed who he is, knew his mum st annes pier 1988 I know I was quick but it was cold.

Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:17 am  

maurice wrote:

Just sussed who he is, knew his mum st annes pier 1988 I know I was quick but it was cold.

Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:06 am  

maurice wrote:

Just sussed who he is, knew his mum st annes pier 1988 I know I was quick but it was cold.

Like father like son then

Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:23 am  

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/21847269 Case closed.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/21847269 Case closed.

Re: Tonight showed Leigh need dual contracts / partnership : Sat Apr 20, 2013 7:00 am  

The DW is too big for the town. It needs 5000 less seats and the corners sorting.