Re: Squad v Haven : Sun Jan 30, 2022 10:29 pm
Bent&Bongser wrote:
It was laxer than lax - Haven only had 10 (maybe 11) on the field when they scored. About a minute before that, Bongser thought to himself (as no one else listens to his thoughts) "We might very well nil these guys but, whilst our press defence is good in their half, the defence in our own looks flaky."
There are sterner tests to come and the team need to learn a new interpretation of the old chestnut "It's a game of two halves!"
Centurions generally in control though and Bongser would have loved a centre the size of MacDonald to the inside in the former's lacklustre days on the wing. Did Nene get to take the matchball home?
Early doors leaders, let's hope we stay there - the club's tag line was already looking tired a couple of years ago.
There are sterner tests to come and the team need to learn a new interpretation of the old chestnut "It's a game of two halves!"
Centurions generally in control though and Bongser would have loved a centre the size of MacDonald to the inside in the former's lacklustre days on the wing. Did Nene get to take the matchball home?
Early doors leaders, let's hope we stay there - the club's tag line was already looking tired a couple of years ago.
Bongser , a fair view from you , against 10 men I felt we should have kept them out , even AL said the same , we could have had more points had the ball gone to hand and not to ground , McDonald could have had 5or 6 tries on another day , but it will come , a good all round start .Charlie knows.