: Thu May 07, 2009 8:57 pm  

Starbug wrote:

It showed a distinct lack of confidence and leadership to take the 2 points when Haven were dead on their feet

Without Webster they were clueless

We need Durbin to follow him all over the pitch next week

Rowley needs to stick a ginger wig on one of our lot next week in training and have everybody tackling him with or without the ball

I like the idea, stick it on Stewart

: Thu May 07, 2009 9:27 pm  

Starbug wrote:

It showed a distinct lack of confidence and leadership to take the 2 points when Haven were dead on their feet

Without Webster they were clueless

We need Durbin to follow him all over the pitch next week

Rowley needs to stick a ginger wig on one of our lot next week in training and have everybody tackling him with or without the ball

I thought Webster was the clueless one? 10 posts ago he was criticised now he's the main man.

If Doran hadn't have tackled Calvert then he was under the sticks, the winning try came from bad positional play by Vark and Flynn.

And back to the heading of the title, we aren't going to part time - we ARE part time!

: Thu May 07, 2009 9:32 pm  

Starbug wrote:

Rowley needs to stick a ginger wig on one of our lot next week in training and have everybody tackling him with or without the ball

Have you an issue with these people......

: Thu May 07, 2009 9:33 pm  

I am not trying to be funny but i thought Widnes were full time.

: Thu May 07, 2009 9:37 pm  

I thought they were dross.......

: Thu May 07, 2009 9:43 pm  

Saying they are part time is an easy way to justify their performances and it serves to calm down the fans....a little bit anyway

: Thu May 07, 2009 9:54 pm  

AJ Viking wrote:

I thought Webster was the clueless one? 10 posts ago he was criticised now he's the main man.

If Doran hadn't have tackled Calvert then he was under the sticks, the winning try came from bad positional play by Vark and Flynn.

And back to the heading of the title, we aren't going to part time - we ARE part time!

I was saying exactly that after 30 minutes , and just coundn't see where you were going to score from , then he throws 3 dummies and you are back in the game

So no he isn't the main man , but tonight he was the only threat you had

: Thu May 07, 2009 10:10 pm  

DemonUK wrote:

mid table team, like us or am i being to optimistic about us

Looking at the league tables, they already are

: Thu May 07, 2009 10:11 pm  

Starbug wrote:

I was saying exactly that after 30 minutes , and just coundn't see where you were going to score from , then he throws 3 dummies and you are back in the game

So no he isn't the main man , but tonight he was the only threat you had

To be fair i thought Duffys inside passes were very unpredictable and hard for the defence to read. I could swear at one point i saw a Haven player have to actually put down his pot of tea to make the tackle after a Duffy drop off ball.

: Fri May 08, 2009 12:45 am  

ian c wrote:

I am not trying to be funny but i thought Widnes were full time.

I think we are having trouble getting the part-timers to match up with the full-timers. Instead of just carrying on training during the day and having certain players miss training sessions, I think we'll try more evening session and get everyone training together.

To be honest, we should have seen it coming - everytime a club tries to run a mixed full-time/part-time squad they run into trouble. I believe we had trouble with it back in 2006 and Doncaster in 2007. Would I be right in saying Leigh also had a few issues with it the other year too?

It appears the only way you should run the playing squad is all full-time or all part-time - having a mix doesn't suit anyone.