: Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:31 pm
Realistically, can anyone see a big money backer investing his hard earned for 2 or 3 years in a heartland club, when the franchise process is not really a process at all, or at least not one with any discernable fairness.
Of course if that backer is given an assurance he will definitely be in SL and that he can have as many overseas players as he liked to give them a huge advantage in a lower league. They can then justify their flawed decision process by saying the team is successful and ready on the playing field as well. Mr Samuels-he done good.
Come on guys, Gateshead now overflowing with overseas players (how do they pay them on crowds of 400) and Rod Findlay (ex?)RFL employee who headed the franchise committee now working for them too.
Gateshead/Toulouse in. No one out. Closed shop of 16 clubs and only about 14 of the remaining current 19 RFL member clubs left in existence.
...and so my fellow Rugby League fans: ask not what the RFL can do for you - ask what the RFL can do for itself.
Answer: Whatever it likes when the clubs outside Super League are too scared to challenge them. Why won't they, its not as if the RFL can withold funding. What funding there is has so many conditions not many if any will get it.
There will be a few more Donnys and Rochdales over the next 18 months