Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Fri May 27, 2016 8:04 pm  

propforward 2338 wrote:

think we need to send our players to football matches to learn how to dive.What are you supposed to do if someone is knocking hell out of you

Or send them to Leigh Boxing Club to learn the art of 'slipping punches'.

Duck 'n' weave lads, duck 'n' weave.

Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Fri May 27, 2016 8:10 pm  

Course he was. Had I been a Bradford player I would have followed instructions and he clearly did.

Bet he gets a bonus payment of a tenner.

Matters not. Let Bradford throw their money away. It will cost em in the long run.

Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Fri May 27, 2016 9:06 pm  

Let me be clear, that statement has done both of them no favours at all. In fact it is so appallingly bad, so obviously written for them, it lacks any form of sincerity what so ever.

If I were them, I would now fully expect the maximum ban each offence carries with probably a couple of extra matches in addition just for contempt, knowing the RFL.

Deary me.

Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Fri May 27, 2016 9:14 pm  

frank1 wrote:

Course he was. Had I been a Bradford player I would have followed instructions and he clearly did.

Bet he gets a bonus payment of a tenner.

Matters not. Let Bradford throw their money away. It will cost em in the long run.

Can we help you Frank me thinks you may be on the wrong thread

Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Fri May 27, 2016 9:19 pm  

I think he was replying to me but forgot to quote. Regards Fleming on a mission from Bradford seeing as he was cited for 6 possible offences and received 3 yes 3 grade B charges.

Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Fri May 27, 2016 10:12 pm  

Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:

Let me be clear, that statement has done both of them no favours at all. In fact it is so appallingly bad, so obviously written for them, it lacks any form of sincerity what so ever.

If I were them, I would now fully expect the maximum ban each offence carries with probably a couple of extra matches in addition just for contempt, knowing the RFL.

Deary me.

I have to agree with you Harold. Definitely not the best bit of PR the club has put out.

Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Fri May 27, 2016 10:29 pm  

DemonUK wrote:

I think he was replying to me but forgot to quote. Regards Fleming on a mission from Bradford seeing as he was cited for 6 possible offences and received 3 yes 3 grade B charges.

I was.

Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Fri May 27, 2016 11:04 pm  

Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:

Let me be clear, that statement has done both of them no favours at all. In fact it is so appallingly bad, so obviously written for them, it lacks any form of sincerity what so ever.

If I were them, I would now fully expect the maximum ban each offence carries with probably a couple of extra matches in addition just for contempt, knowing the RFL.

Deary me.

Their little baby,took another hammering tonight.

Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Sat May 28, 2016 9:58 am  

Have you employed Comical Ali as your PR man?

Latest in a long line of poorly executed or blatant lying propaganda releases. The worst thing is that you Leythers are in the main lapping it up (a couple of sensible exceptions above).

What this insincere release actually says is "we're really not sorry, but we hope by pretending to be, we get off lightly".

Re: Statement from Gareth Hock and Jamie Acton : Sat May 28, 2016 10:39 pm  

Homer_J_Simpson wrote:

Have you employed Comical Ali as your PR man?

Latest in a long line of poorly executed or blatant lying propaganda releases. The worst thing is that you Leythers are in the main lapping it up (a couple of sensible exceptions above).

What this insincere release actually says is "we're really not sorry, but we hope by pretending to be, we get off lightly".

Things must be really Dull at ....

DULL RLFC !!!