: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:34 pm  

Bartholemew Smythe wrote:

It does make me chuckle being directed to the ST card only entrance in the North Stand.... Just to be instructed to go through the turnstyles after showing my ST card........I might show another card in another 30+ days and see what the outcome is ....

Good job us Leythers are all honest folks and don't skim them over the fence for somebody else to use again.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:36 pm  

Leyther_Matt wrote:

Good job us Leythers are all honest folks and don't skim them over the fence for somebody else to use again.

If the fans were as good as the players theyd drop them down a drain

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:36 pm  

Starbug wrote:

As I posted earlier

I think we have cross wires on this one.

I an not trying to be clever or be my usual critic of all things RFL but this is what they stipulate to all clubs not just ours

I have spoken to others about it

Simple question.....will this position benefit the club ?
Its just a question of how much - which time will tell.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:43 pm  

Leeeigh Leeeigh wrote:

I think we have cross wires on this one.



Simple question.....will this position benefit the club ?
Its just a question of how much - which time will tell.

As I said though , I seriously doubt anybody will take up the position for any sensible length of time because the money is tied into producing results , and getting those results will be virtually impossible

The original poster was asking what had happened and what was the person achieving

The answer is no and nothing at the moment

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:16 am  

So the RFL want to see an improvement on the current situation. Does bringing in player sponsorship count? If so it shouldn't be too hard to show an improvement when you can currently open up their very own "game on" magazine at the Leigh match page and look at our list of player sponsors, then flick through all the other games in our division and not find any other clubs with less sponsored players.

At this stage in the season nobody in their right mind will be phoning up to sponsor a player at the full season rate so anything we bring in now is a bonus, and the main hope would be that if you bring in sponsors now and treat them right you might get to keep a few on for next season as well.

IMHO first we should be offering packages pro-rata to cover the remaining games & throw in a couple of appropriate incentives (tickets, meals etc) if necessary. And if that doesn't get them in, contact all our existing and former sponsors, together with small local businesses that might not normally be able to afford full season-long sponsorship, and sell the sponsorship like a raffle. Every business pays £100 and gets a few program ads guaranteed. But a chosen few (ie however many are left unsponsored) will be selected for free player sponsorship for the remaining games. Let's face it, if we make even just a few £100's would be better than receiving nothing and letting the sponsorships sit empty for the rest of the season.

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:17 pm  

put it this way businesses are getting phone calls and e mails and post from Dave and Annette offering deals all the time, but as at most small to medium businesses times are hard at the moment and certainly my 'corporate and sponsorship' drawer has to remain closed for the forseeable future

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:38 pm  

imleythbenter wrote:

put it this way businesses are getting phone calls and e mails and post from Dave and Annette offering deals all the time, but as at most small to medium businesses times are hard at the moment and certainly my 'corporate and sponsorship' drawer has to remain closed for the forseeable future

Understandaly so, and I'm glad to hear the club are still working on this side of the business, it just depresses me when I see the number of gaps in our sponsorship column of the program. I appreciate Dave & Annette will also have many other jobs to do at the club as well, so don't think I'm having a go at them specifically, it's more an example of something that someone in a "new position" funded by the RFL could maybe assist with.

The point I was trying to make is that with a RFL-funded "new person" on board it shouldn't be too difficult to find a metric through which we could demonstrate "improvement" to the RFL to justify the new position they would be funding.

[Dick Jones]

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:46 pm  

WE,VE HAD OFFERS SENT THROUGH TOO, FROM THE CLUB AND THE LSV PEOPLE ALSO.

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:57 pm  

Sack Dave Bradshaw, interview him for the new position, give him the job and we get Dave Bradshaw paid by the RFL. Simples!

[Dick Jones]

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:03 pm  

That was suggested already