Re: Sam Barlow : Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:21 pm  

Hindsfordleyther79 wrote:

Don't disagree, just don't like the other side of his game. If he stopped the stupidity he would be even better.

There was a stupid person playing your correct, Lee Doran is his name ! what a B@@d@y nuisance he is! every tackle he's niggling the bloke's a penalty machine! I personally only saw barlow transgress once and, that was the incident he was sin binned for! I have been very impressed and pleased by his performances and, his teamates are not bad either

Re: Sam Barlow : Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:23 pm  

I though running in to punch a man on the floor was idiotic of him and deservedly got him sin binned, hope Rowley will have words and make sure that doesn't happen again. Other than that thought he had a great game, Whitehaven came to rough it up and once they were out of the game just stepped that up and Barlow and the rest of the team responded in kind without over stepping the line (apart from Barlow's sin binning).

Re: Sam Barlow : Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:24 am  

I would still prefer us to play with 13 players on the field. He has to learn to do what Timmy did in his later years and that was to laugh at those trying to wind him up. He will be targeted especially by the better sides.

Re: Sam Barlow : Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:25 am  

Lowton_Sparrow wrote:

I though running in to punch a man on the floor was idiotic of him and deservedly got him sin binned, hope Rowley will have words and make sure that doesn't happen again. Other than that thought he had a great game, Whitehaven came to rough it up and once they were out of the game just stepped that up and Barlow and the rest of the team responded in kind without over stepping the line (apart from Barlow's sin binning).

Spot on.

Re: Sam Barlow : Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:07 pm  

mmm it doesn't look like a 'run in' on the video that the judiciary will have.

Re: Sam Barlow : Mon Mar 03, 2014 3:39 pm  

Sam got sin binned, was the incident put on report ? , surely if not then no case to answer, Sam did not get sent off, sin binned

Re: Sam Barlow : Mon Mar 03, 2014 3:51 pm  

According to Dave's report in the LE, two unspecified Leigh players have been put on report for alleged late contacts on Southernwood and Taylor.

Re: Sam Barlow : Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:01 pm  

Think it is Spencer and Barlow.

Spencer will have nothing to worry about imo but re Sam I will decide when I watch the incident again when Fred puts the full game on Centurion TV.

Re: Sam Barlow : Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:13 pm  

I thought spencer had something to worry about but Barlow not

Re: Sam Barlow : Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:34 pm  

The more I see of Sam the more impressed I am.

OK I can see that if he develops a bad boy reputation that precedes him (like Timmy did) then he may have to be a bit careful, but he has a long way to go to do that and I don't agree with the comments about him overstepping the mark on a regular basis. I think all he's done so far is play hard and be up for the challenge physically. He's a tough lad and one I want in my pack every week. As has been mentioned before we have a pack now that can really dominate. For me its the best we've had since the one Benson assembled - big difference is this time they have the discipline to go along with the aggression.

And finally, the sinbinning I thought was harsh - I need to re-watch on LCTV but I thought Barlows "offence" was just a swinging arm into the mid-section of the player on his way down. Not cheap or dirty, and something you see in a lot of games. But it was at a point in the game where Haven were wanting to bring the game down to their level, kicking off after every tackle, and the ref (who'd lost control of the game 20 mins earlier) took the bait and binned him. For me the retaliation was as bad as or worse than the tackle itself, and it was either a double-binning for the fight or nothing (maybe simple pen to Haven at a push if the player was down and you see it as a flop)