: Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:20 pm  

Birkbygiant wrote:

The Whino players certainly did alot of whino'ing to Ganson, they need to put a stop to that!

Why no sin binning though, every time you see them they give the refs constant grief, moaning, groaning, arguing blatant penalties (how many forward passes do they get away with every game). they're the most penalised team in the league for a reason, the more you get in their faces the more they moan, groan and resort to being the dirty cheating team they are.

: Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:26 pm  

They kept going on about Atkins. Jeez he was Senior's b*tch all night.

And the gate. Last year 9.8K. This year 6.4K. That is around £35K down on gate.

Not Wakey's night.

: Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:30 pm  

Poor Wakey ----------------------------

: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:07 pm  

ShelleyGiant wrote:

Why no sin binning though, every time you see them they give the refs constant grief, moaning, groaning, arguing blatant penalties (how many forward passes do they get away with every game). they're the most penalised team in the league for a reason, the more you get in their faces the more they moan, groan and resort to being the dirty cheating team they are.

And CHAMPIONS!

: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:39 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

They kept going on about Atkins. Jeez he was Senior's b*tch all night.

And the gate. Last year 9.8K. This year 6.4K. That is around £35K down on gate.

Not Wakey's night.

There were far more in the ground than 6,400!

Agree about Atkins. Thought Snitch and Korky had good games though.

[Durham Giant]

: Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:33 pm  

Maybe it is just me but i wanted Wakey to win. I felt that they deserved it. Leeds sportsmanship, arrogance and constant backchatting to the ref really infuriated me and i was thinking, i hope you lose your arrogant gets.

: Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:42 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

Maybe it is just me but i wanted Wakey to win. I felt that they deserved it. Leeds sportsmanship, arrogance and constant backchatting to the ref really infuriated me and i was thinking, i hope you lose your arrogant gets.

My thoughts entirely, they should have had a man binned for all the slaver they were giving.

: Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:49 pm  

Ganson would have binned a player from any other team below Leeds in the table for that sort of backchat without a seconds thought.

: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:56 am  

Aye the 10-4 penalty count (10-1 at one stage) clearly shows him to be favouring the biggest rivals of his hometown team! Careful this small team mentality might develop into full-blown paranoia!

: Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:13 am  

I don't think Ganson was favouring Leeds at all. At one point I said to the missus "The Leeds fans must be taking the mick out of Ganson over his antics last week". He seemed to be giving Wakey all the decisions. Although I do agree on the comment that if anybody other than the big 2 teams had been back chatting like Leeds were, they would definately have been sin-binned for it. On quite a few occasions last night, especially Brough, the player who had been tackled was holding the tackler down in order to try and gain a penalty and Ganson totally ignored it. When we had Ganson a couple of weeks ago he penalised Sculthorpe for doing that. I said at the time that was typical of Ganson, just doing his own thing, the man has no consistancy in his decisions. Personally I would rather have anybody but Ganson, the game is about the players not him.