Re: Disciplinary betting. : Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:50 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

I think it'll depend on whether the panel decides the sin bin was for fighting or the stamp... if for the stamp, probably 2 games. If for the fighting, 3 games for the stamp.

they'll never give him three.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:51 pm  

king warrior wrote:

He also got dropped like a bad habit

What channel was you watching it on? I must have missed that.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:59 pm  

10 mins in bin sufficient


browns hit in the final seconds !!! then running over to the giants fans at the end.... ohhhhh upset the wiganers abit

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:19 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

I think it'll depend on whether the panel decides the sin bin was for fighting or the stamp...

Oh, look, it's Fishsta!

He didn't stamp. You have to lift your leg up and then bring it back down hard to make a stamp (unless we're talking about the things we stick on envelopes). That wasn't a stamp. It was a press. And I would imagine a gentle press too, because Mace is that kind of guy. Just wanted to show Fielden some lurve, and it worked.

It was a good match, that. I enjoyed it. Well done Hudds!

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:26 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Oh, look, it's Fishsta!

He didn't stamp. You have to lift your leg up and then bring it back down hard to make a stamp (unless we're talking about the things we stick on envelopes). That wasn't a stamp. It was a press. And I would imagine a gentle press too, because Mace is that kind of guy. Just wanted to show Fielden some lurve, and it worked.

It was a good match, that. I enjoyed it. Well done Hudds!

You can't say well done to constant dirty play... oh, wait, the clue is in your name, of course you can... you do it every week.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:57 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

You can't say well done to constant dirty play... oh, wait, the clue is in your name, of course you can... you do it every week.

And you don't? Tonight was a one off? We're lucky to have 17 heads still on 17 bodies.

[Durham Giant]

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:38 pm  

Re Mason if he gets a ban for standing on a player then Tompkins should get one for standing on Fa alogos hand. Check it out at 15mins 37 on the clock just before Tompkins gives away his penalty. he had no need to step out with his foot towards fa alogos back hand other than to foul him.


I look forward to Wigan fans supporting his ban for dangerous, dirty, niggly play

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:58 pm  

DG; you're wrong.


Wigan Wigan Wigan. Wigan this, Wigan that, Wigan the other. Wigan blah, Wigan blurgh!

Even after full time Phil Clarke was spunking Wigan until he remembered they hadn't won!
When I say they hadn't won I mean, of course, they lost. You wouldn't have known from the post match analysis though.

I short; thanks Wigan for letting us win at your place. Again. Very gracious. That must explain why loads of you left with 5mins to go; inside information.

P.S. Did I go to the game? No. I'm on my jollies in no mark land. Slewed off my tits taking the rise out of a load of Wigan fans.

I wish I was in Blackpool! Ha ha!

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:13 pm  

Wadski wrote:

Yet O Loughlin gets away with high shots every tackle?

Jesus sunshine. You've got some strong C@W glasses there.

You know, I actually thought you were sensible.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:16 pm  

Enicomb wrote:

You know, I actually thought you were sensible.

I've seen worse go unpunished.