: Sun May 31, 2009 6:02 pm  

Wadski wrote:

Maybe John Keer asked him to play differently as it suited their style? Someone being paid should a high salary should be able to adapt their gameplay.

Indeed. Though as he seemed to do a fair bit of ball playing I don't quite understand what it was that he was being asked to do that made his 2 year stint a 'nightmare'.

Considering that some people connected to the club have really suffered over the last year or 2 I think Scully could have handled this better but it's no real concern of ours now.

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Sun May 31, 2009 6:17 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

Nope. He is on the high £80ks. Amazing but true.

Why is that amazing ? And you're convinced it's true aren't you, you really are lad

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Sun May 31, 2009 6:21 pm  

marillion man wrote:

Why is that amazing ? And you're convinced it's true aren't you, you really are lad

It was in The Sun so it must be true!

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Sun May 31, 2009 6:24 pm  

Neggy wrote:

It was in The Sun so it must be true!

excuse me , marsey is the law what she don't know about wakey is not worth knowing

: Sun May 31, 2009 8:23 pm  

vastman wrote:

Jeez you're a bore - and clearly know feck all.

You are sooooo easy.

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Sun May 31, 2009 8:29 pm  

marillion man wrote:

Why is that amazing ? And you're convinced it's true aren't you, you really are lad

Your English is improving. Well done.

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Sun May 31, 2009 8:31 pm  

Mutts wrote:

excuse me , marsey is the law what she don't know about wakey is not worth knowing

And all that you know about wakey isn't worth knowing.

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Sun May 31, 2009 8:40 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

In the Examiner scully explains how Trin did not use his strengths and that he is motivated by what Brown has said to him.

Paying a guy close on £90K and then not using him properly. They must have money to burn.

I hope the 'sudden disappearance' of Richard Moore does not mean he will be on his way to the Giants.

What is it with wakey and props? :shock:

I'm not sure about that! So they pay 1/20 of their salary cap to a guy who isn't even on the pitch for 80 mins?
On a similar note with regard to salaries i'd been told ( by very close friend of player at Saints) that Long is only on £80K basic at Saints plus bonuses etc. That to me sounds like a much more realistic figure.

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Sun May 31, 2009 8:48 pm  

the exile wrote:

I'm not sure about that! So they pay 1/20 of their salary cap to a guy who isn't even on the pitch for 80 mins?
On a similar note with regard to salaries i'd been told ( by very close friend of player at Saints) that Long is only on £80K basic at Saints plus bonuses etc. That to me sounds like a much more realistic figure.

What Sants pay Long or what % of the wakey spend is on Scully is not relevant.

He is on close on £90K. I do not think he is worth it.

Likewise if posters in general - not saying you Exile - want to pretend he is paid peanuts, let them. It does not change what he is paid.

Re: SCULLY SPILLS THE BEANS : Sun May 31, 2009 9:02 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

What Sants pay Long or what % of the wakey spend is on Scully is not relevant.

He is on close on £90K. I do not think he is worth it.

Likewise if posters in general - not saying you Exile - want to pretend he is paid peanuts, let them. It does not change what he is paid.

FFS do you work for the IRS , your obsession with wakeys wage bill is getting rather frighting

enjoy yourself tonight should be about hudddersfield in the semis