: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:52 pm  

Raleigh isnt a dirty player at all, tough as teak though

Crabtree, brilliant
Mason, brilliant
Cudjoe, brilliant.

That was an object lesson tonight in total and utter pack dominance. Superb

: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:53 pm  

Birkbygiant wrote:

What I still can't understand was how Silverwood gave that 40-20 to HKR, he must have seen it 5 times on the screen and the kicker was not in his own 40 meters when he kicked it??

Yeah he was that was the 30 metre line that was behind him. I thought he'd gone to the screen to check where it bounced into touch.It would have been nice if that could have been indicated on the big screen but such is life.

: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:56 pm  

Code13 wrote:

Raleigh isnt a dirty player at all, tough as teak though

Crabtree, brilliant
Mason, brilliant
Cudjoe, brilliant.

That was an object lesson tonight in total and utter pack dominance. Superb

Hard to disagree mate though a fit and firing Vella & Lovegrove (along with Galea in the pack) then the game would have taken a whole new complexion though maybe we'll meet in the play-offs...

: Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:04 pm  

Mad_Jack_Mcmad wrote:

Yeah he was that was the 30 metre line that was behind him. I thought he'd gone to the screen to check where it bounced into touch.It would have been nice if that could have been indicated on the big screen but such is life.

If it was then fair enough, I saw it live and thought it was the forty, as did many of the fans in the side stands.

You had the benefit of the commentary, which I haven't heard.

: Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:07 pm  

Have to say when I saw it I thought it was well behind the 40, then the replay changed my mind, ah well.

: Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:19 pm  

Birkbygiant wrote:

If it was then fair enough, I saw it live and thought it was the forty, as did many of the fans in the side stands.

You had the benefit of the commentary, which I haven't heard.

Nah I was at the match and initially thought it was the forty as well. I just assumed at the time it must have been the thirty cos no one is that blind. Speaking to others who watched it on tv it was the thirty.

: Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:27 pm  

Mad_Jack_Mcmad wrote:

Nah I was at the match and initially thought it was the forty as well. I just assumed at the time it must have been the thirty cos no one is that blind. Speaking to others who watched it on tv it was the thirty.

Well you've had the benefit of speaking to the people watching it on the TV, I haven't.

From the side stand I thought it was the 40, it's Silverwood we're talkign about.

Many people during the game thought he'd got it wrong, but fortunately for us your team messed up the opportunity that came.

: Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:28 pm  

Birkbygiant wrote:

What I still can't understand was how Silverwood gave that 40-20 to HKR, he must have seen it 5 times on the screen and the kicker was not in his own 40 meters when he kicked it??

thought the same, stevo said it then changed to oh thats the 30 line??? wasnt from where i was sitting...if im wrong i stand corrected though

: Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:36 pm  

piglet19 wrote:

thought the same, stevo said it then changed to oh thats the 30 line??? wasnt from where i was sitting...if im wrong i stand corrected though

We don't seem to have the metres marked out lately, which would have helped to clear things up.

: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:07 am  

Birkbygiant wrote:

What I still can't understand was how Silverwood gave that 40-20 to HKR, he must have seen it 5 times on the screen and the kicker was not in his own 40 meters when he kicked it??

My mate thought that the ball was touched by a giants player