Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:13 pm  

Code13 wrote:

Its pots and kettles because for years Wigan have been the home to one of the dirtiest, most cowardly players in Super League in the shape of Sean O'Loughlin (and Terry Newton before him)

Now thats an over exaggeration. When does he intentially stamp on players on the ground? Not defending some of his tackling, but he hardly opts for the cowardly approach. Unlike many of you I can actually except when one of our players does something, hence why I had absolutely no complaints when Coley got sent off and then suspended for 2 games in July.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:15 pm  

LOLalicious!

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:26 pm  

Well though out response there... and I didnt even defend Lockers, just saying it was an over reaction to say he's the dirtiest Superleague player.

Ok then, Mason is inocent and it was an accident but at the same time he was just winding Fielden up. So its not his fault. Everyone at Wigan are dirty players and always get away with it and no Giants players ever do anything wrong, and there all sweet little angels...

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:33 pm  

Well you're certainly an expert on over-reactions, that is for sure.

ATEOTD you're biased as well. To make insinuations of bias when you see some of the utter guff that has been posted over on Wigan's board, well, it's a bit rich. So you'll have to forgive me if I find that a tad funny.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:15 pm  

at the end of the day this is about a guy who stamped, stood, whatever you want call it on Fielden. Yet not many Gaints fans can get past their bias and admit that its was wrong and he deserves a ban. What this has to do with Lockers I dont know and just shows how baised you are that your trying to justify Mason by your hatred of Lockers. Not an overreaction just simpley saying it how it is. If im biased then it really doesnt say much for you.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:19 pm  

Bondi_Warrior wrote:

at the end of the day this is about a guy who stamped, stood, whatever you want call it on Fielden.

We'll go with the RFL then, standing

2-3 games

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:26 pm  

Bondi_Warrior wrote:

Everyone at Wigan are dirty players and always get away with it

Seasons 2009 and season 2010 to date

Up before the RFL

Mason 10 times (various offences)..........1 £300 fine

O Loughlin 11 times(mainly head high or grapple)......Nothing


Pretty even on appearances, your boy seems very lucky when hes up before em

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:30 pm  

Gahan wrote:

Seasons 2009 and season 2010 to date

Up before the RFL

Mason 10 times (various offences)..........1 £300 fine

O Loughlin 11 times(mainly head high or grapple)......Nothing


Pretty even on appearances, your boy seems very lucky when hes up before em

I havent defended him. Ive seen several times were I think some of our players have been lucky to get away with it. I just wish fans of other clubs could say the same. IMO the disciplinary is rather too weak in Superleague.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:39 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

Re Mason if he gets a ban for standing on a player then Tompkins should get one for standing on Fa alogos hand. Check it out at 15mins 37 on the clock just before Tompkins gives away his penalty. he had no need to step out with his foot towards fa alogos back hand other than to foul him.


I look forward to Wigan fans supporting his ban for dangerous, dirty, niggly play

Well ive got it at 15mins 37 and all I can see is fighting after Mason stamps on Fielden!! Its about 1 min later and even Faalogo doesnt react as its not intentional he would have to be talented to be holding a bloke that big and re adjust to stand on his hand!!

While we are on it if Mason and Fielden get 10 for fighting why does Griffin stay on??

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:41 pm  

Ian Roberts Closet wrote:

Well ive got it at 15mins 37 and all I can see is fighting after Mason stamps on Fielden!! Its about 1 min later and even Faalogo doesnt react as its not intentional he would have to be talented to be holding a bloke that big and re adjust to stand on his hand!!

While we are on it if Mason and Fielden get 10 for fighting why does Griffin stay on??

He's defending his himself incase Fielden accidentally connects with someone. Fortunately Fielden had his eyes closed and missed everyone.