: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:30 am  

You are indeed right Meast.

As ever Ganson picks and chooses not only what he will penalise, but when he will penalise certain offences.

Both teams had players guilty of it all game, only Sculthorpe got pinged for it though. Yes it was a penalty.

Actually, we could get round, through and over Cas's defence, just not finish.

As someone esle said, how did Robbo blow a 3 on 1 break, all he had to do was pass the ball. Hell he could have not passed it and we would have done better.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:11 pm  

Yep, you wouldn't see that miss in a reserves, academy or amateur game.

[Durham Giant]

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:11 pm  

Code13 wrote:

You are indeed right Meast.

As ever Ganson picks and chooses not only what he will penalise, but when he will penalise certain offences.

Both teams had players guilty of it all game, only Sculthorpe got pinged for it though. Yes it was a penalty.

Actually, we could get round, through and over Cas's defence, just not finish.

As someone esle said, how did Robbo blow a 3 on 1 break, all he had to do was pass the ball. Hell he could have not passed it and we would have done better.

I am sure it has been mentoned that it was the lack of options given to Robbo by the support players that caused the problem. Lolesi looked to come inside but then did not. Robbo was then left with two Giants players and the defence on his RHS in a very tight space. It was the fault of the support players as much as Robbo

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:52 pm  

Code13 wrote:

Does no one read other peoples posts?

Nope we prefer to have a bitchfest on here instead

Itchy finger time once again

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:06 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

I am sure it has been mentoned that it was the lack of options given to Robbo by the support players that caused the problem. Lolesi looked to come inside but then did not. Robbo was then left with two Giants players and the defence on his RHS in a very tight space. It was the fault of the support players as much as Robbo

Robbo went in, out, in, out - the only thing he didn't do was shake it all about. Lolesi's head must have been spinning, especially as he's just come back from seeing stars himself. I think Robbo was trying too hard to impress his Barmy Army. If it had been the in the second half he wouldn't have had the distraction.

[Durham Giant]

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:14 pm  

TBC wrote:

Robbo went in, out, in, out - the only thing he didn't do was shake it all about. Lolesi's head must have been spinning, especially as he's just come back from seeing stars himself. I think Robbo was trying too hard to impress his Barmy Army. If it had been the in the second half he wouldn't have had the distraction.

I must have missed that i was too busy checking out the blonde girls sat behind me as they were shaking there pom poms.

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:28 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

I must have missed that i was too busy checking out the blonde girls sat behind me as they were shaking there pom poms.

Did you end up seeing stars?

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:42 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

I am sure it has been mentoned that it was the lack of options given to Robbo by the support players that caused the problem. Lolesi looked to come inside but then did not. Robbo was then left with two Giants players and the defence on his RHS in a very tight space. It was the fault of the support players as much as Robbo

Sorry, but rubbish.

Robbo had ample opportunity to pass to Jammer & Leroy well before he made the attempt. Indeed he should have passed at least 10m earlier & Leroy had a free run to the line.

But yes, I suppose he was in front of the 'Team Robbo' gang!